تحلیل مضامین تحقق الگوی حکمرانی خوب شهری (مطالعه موردی: شهرداری تهران)
محورهای موضوعی : شهرسازی اسلامیشهریار دبیرزاده 1 * , محمود شفیعی 2 , سید علی میرموسوی 3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه مفید، قم، ایران
2 - دانشیار گروه علوم سیاسی دانشگاه مفید، قم، ایران
3 - دانشیار گروه علوم سیاسی دانشگاه مفید، قم، ایران
کلید واژه: حکمرانی خوب شهری, شهرداری تهران, مدیریت شهری, سیاست‌گذاری.,
چکیده مقاله :
حکمرانی خوب شهری به‌عنوان یکی از اصول مهم توسعه پایدار، نقش کلیدی در بهبود کیفیت زندگی شهروندان دارد. با افزایش جمعیت شهری و پیچیدگی‌های رشد شهرها، نیاز به الگویی جامع برای حکمرانی مؤثر شهری احساس می‌شود. این پژوهش با رویکرد کیفی و تحلیل مضمون، به بررسی تدوین الگوی حکمرانی خوب شهری در شهرداری تهران می‌پردازد. برای استخراج داده‌ها، 15 مصاحبه عمیق نیمه‌ساختاریافته با متخصصان حوزه حکمرانی و مدیریت شهری انجام شد. پس از کدگذاری و دسته‌بندی داده‌ها، سه عامل الزامات، موانع و ذی‌نفعان در الگوی حکمرانی خوب شهری شناسایی شده است. اعتماد، انصاف، انعطاف‌پذیری، برابری، عدالت و شفافیت از مهم‌ترین الزامات به‌دست‌آمده و مهم‌ترین موانع، برنامه‌گریزی، سیاست‌زدگی و مدیریت عمودی بودند. در پایان نیز با توجه به تحلیل الگوی ترسیم شده از برآیند مصاحبهها، مقایسه و تطبیق نتایج با ادبیات نظری مدل تدقیق شده‌ای در سطوح جامعه، دولت محلی و بازار با توجه به سازه‌های ذهنی ارائه گردیده و میتوان این الگوی پیشنهادی را به‌مثابه استراتژی اصلی برای تحقق الزامات و رفع موانع حکمرانی شهرداری تهران در نظر گرفت.
Good Urban Governance Model
(Case Study: Tehran Municipality)
Shahryar Dabirzadeh*
Mahmood Shafiei**
Seyed Ali Mir-Mousavi***
Good urban governance, as one of the fundamental principles of sustainable development, plays a crucial role in improving the quality of life for citizens. With the increase in urban population and the complexities of urban growth, there is a pressing need for a comprehensive model for effective urban governance. This study, using a qualitative approach and thematic analysis, aims to explore the realization of the good urban governance model, focusing on the requirements, barriers, and stakeholders in urban management, particularly in the context of Tehran Municipality. The study identifies trust, fairness, flexibility, equality, justice, and transparency as key requirements, while the most significant barriers include planning evasion, political interference, and vertical management. The research culminates in the development of a model, integrating theoretical literature, based on the results of interviews, and proposes strategies for implementing the good governance model across societal, local government, and market levels.
Keywords: Good Urban Governance, Tehran Municipality, Urban Management, Policy Making.
Introduction
In today's world, cities serve as pivotal centers for economic, cultural, and social activities. With the growth of urban populations, the importance of good urban governance has intensified. In the 1990s, international institutions introduced good governance as a key to development (Gisselquis, 2012:5-6). Good governance is viewed as a multi-level and participatory process in contrast to traditional governance systems (Borzel et al., 2008:7). Although there has been a long history of organizational activities such as municipalities in our country, the Tehran Municipality has not yet effectively met the needs of citizens, particularly in large cities. According to global statistics and indices on governance, the state of urban management in Iran, especially in Tehran, clearly shows that urban governance is not in an ideal condition. This situation, reflected by the Global Cities Index (GCI), which ranks Tehran 125th among the top 150 cities worldwide, paints a clear picture of the serious challenges Tehran faces in urban management, particularly in governance and public services (Oxford Economics, 2024). Despite criticism of these indices, they reflect weaknesses in public service delivery, ineffective policies, and reduced institutional transparency, resulting in direct consequences like decreased investment, lower trust, diminished social capital, and weakened sustainable development. In urban development models, moving towards knowledge-based cities is seen as one of the most sustainable and optimal forms of urban development, which must incorporate strategic considerations based on the city's political, economic, cultural, and geographical context (Kalantari et al., 2022:57). The failure of urban development programs in implementing the good governance model or the visible inefficiencies and multi-layered issues in urban management and the effectiveness of urban policies has made this issue problematic. Thus, identifying the requirements, barriers, and stakeholders—three fundamental pillars—can significantly assist in designing an effective model in this field.
Methodology
This study begins with a review and analysis of the literature related to the topic, with a systems-based approach. The main objective of this phase is to explore the concepts and categories related to good governance for Tehran Municipality. In this phase, the dimensions, components, and indices of the good governance model for Tehran Municipality are identified and analyzed using in-depth and exploratory interviews with selected academic experts. The collected qualitative data were analyzed through thematic analysis, which was used to identify and analyze the key dimensions and components. Based on these dimensions and components, a good governance model was proposed, and policies for achieving good governance, especially in confronting complex issues, were designed. In this study, the method used is qualitative analysis, specifically thematic analysis. This approach was chosen because previous models have mostly been designed from a quantitative, physical perspective, whereas this study uses a qualitative approach to analyze previous models and particularly leverage semi-structured interviews.
Discussion and Findings
In this research, the goal of analyzing the themes of the good urban governance model is to first determine the dimensions and concepts of the model in light of its theoretical framework and global definitions. As shown in the initial model and the subject network, legitimacy, flexibility, the execution of urban development programs, equality and justice, accountability, transparency, participation, and trust are core elements of good urban governance in Tehran. Observing the numerous problems caused by centralized management methods suggests that achieving urban and regional development requires involving local and community-based institutions. This requires the development of civil society and approaches to neighborhood-level participatory development.
Trust, as a key parameter of social capital, stands at the center of the model's requirements. Trust directly influences sustainable citizen participation, transparency, efficiency, effectiveness, and justice. It interacts with other requirements, and the designed model emphasizes this relationship. Additionally, implementing urban development plans, accountability, ethical standards, alignment of resources, empowerment of marginalized social groups, rule of law, and legitimacy are essential factors that are more specific to the Iranian context and the city of Tehran, thus making the model more localized. This is an aspect not commonly addressed in global models.
According to the refined model in this study, good urban governance in Iranian municipalities faces deep structural and cultural challenges. The first barrier is the historical, cultural, and social mental frameworks rooted in Iranian thinking, such as a preference for centralized power, reliance on informal processes, and personal connections, all of which conflict with good governance principles like transparency, accountability, and efficiency. The second major challenge is the centralized governance structure in Iran, where urban management remains under central control instead of having the independence to make local decisions. Good urban governance in Iran requires structural transformation, granting relative independence to urban management while also focusing on layered structures, formal processes, and transparency. This transformation can make municipalities accountable, transparent, and efficient, ultimately improving citizens' quality of life.
Conclusion
Implementing the governance model and its requirements, as well as overcoming the barriers to its execution—such as combating corruption and ensuring sustainable citizen participation—faces institutional challenges. The primary finding of this study is that the issue of governance has become a complex phenomenon. In the case of Tehran, this complexity stems from inefficiencies, ineffective policies, and the fragmentation of various governance and municipal issues. Despite numerous laws, incomplete city council regulations, the politicized nature of the capital, and the lack of clear distinctions between national and local issues, governance remains a complex issue. The crucial output from the proposed model and the numerous interviews with urban managers, experts, and supporting documents is that the solution lies in reforming the policy-making and governance model.
Moving towards participatory governance is a key strategy to achieve the required elements in the proposed model for Tehran Municipality. Given the current challenges in urban governance, adopting an adaptive strategy is essential. The concept of adaptation is a political skill aimed at gradual, incremental changes and avoiding extreme responses. The entrenched habit of centralized management, vertical organizational structures, a reluctance to participate, and the mental models of managers and policymakers remain significant barriers to effective participatory governance. Analysis of stakeholders, local institutions, NGOs, and the use of social networks and software can foster involvement and participation in urban affairs. Dividing the city into neighborhoods and creating development plans based on the input of local residents will enhance sustainable, dynamic, and grassroots participation. Ultimately, public trust is one of the most important factors for achieving good governance. In conclusion, good urban governance should be seen not only as a managerial model but also as a social and cultural approach.
References
Adila, W. (2024) Mapping The Evolution of Good Governance: A Literature Review Perspective. Politeia: Journal of Public Administration and Political Science and International Relations, 2(1), 1-11.DOI: https://doi.org/10.61978/politeia.v2i1.143
Arszulowicz, M. (2025) Defining Good Governance: Praxeological Perspective. In Governance Strategies for Effective Sustainable Development (pp. 15-36). IGI Global.
Elliott, M. & Thomas, R. (2024) 10. Good Governance—An Introduction. Public Law.
Eneqvist, E. Algehed, J. Jensen, C. & Karvonen, A. (2022) Legitimacy in municipal experimental governance: questioning the public good in urban innovation practices. European Planning Studies, 30(8), 1596-1614.https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.2015749.
Graham, M. Maloney, M. &Foth, M. (2023) A City of Good Ancestors: Urban Governance and Design from a Relationist Ethos. Designing More-than-Human Smart Cities: Beyond Sustainability, Towards Cohabitation.239-266.DOI:10.1093/9780191980060.003.0014.
Ishak, N. Hasibuan, R. R. &Arbani, T. S. (2020) Bureaucratic and Political Collaboration Towards a Good Governance System. Bestuur, 8(1), 19-26.DOI:10.20961/bestuur. v8i1.42922.
Omri, A. Kahia, M. &Kahouli, B. (2021) Does good governance moderate the financial development-CO2 emissions relationship? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(34), 471516-47503.DOI:10.1007/s11356-021-14014-1
Oxford Economics. (2024) Global Cities Index 2024. Oxford Economics.
World Bank. (2023) Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI). The World Bank Group.
SaeidiRezvani, N. Razavi, N. Mohammad, S. &Rashtiyan, S. M. (2023) Investigating the status of good urban governance indicators and their impact on urban regeneration (Case study of the worn texture of Semnan city). Spatial Planning.
* Corresponding Author: Ph.D. Student Political Science, Mofid University, Qom, Iran.
shahreiardabirzadeh@gmail.com
** Associate Professor of Political Science, Mofid University, Qom, Iran.
*** Associate Professor of Political Science, Mofid University, Qom, Iran.
الفتی، امیر (1400) تأثیر حکمرانی خوب بر سلامت سازمانی با نقش میانجی پاسخگویی در وزارت ورزش و جوانان ایران. فصلنامه علمی پژوهش‌های کاربردی در مدیریت ورزشی، 10(3)، صص 77-88
. doi: 10.30473/arsm.2022.8529
. بادکو، بهروز و محمد قاسمیسیانی و علی رنجبرکی (1403) تبیین و ارزیابی شاخص‌ها و مؤلفه‌های الگوی حکمرانی شهر تهران با تأکید بر بیانیه گام دوم انقلاب اسلامی ایران، فصلنامه علمی مطالعات شهر ایرانی- اسلامی، شماره پنجاه‌و‌سوم، ص 23
. بوچانی، محمدحسین و مظفر صرافی و جمیله توکلی‌نیا و علی دشتی (1396) تحلیل ساختاری حاکمیت ملی و مدیریت محلی در قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران در پرتو رویکرد حکمروایی شایسته شهری، فصلنامه مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای در علوم انسانی، 9(2)، صص 211-236
. doi: 10.22631/isih.2017.2301.2761
. خسروی، سعید و حمید احمدی و گارینه کشیشیان سیرکی (1399) واکاوی شاخص‌های مؤثر بر حکمرانی خوب شهری در شهر زاهدان، ماهنامه جامعه‌شناسی سیاسی ایران، 3(1)، صص 243-275
. doi: 10.30510/psi.2020.241184.1205
. رحمتی‌فر، سمانه (1401) امکان‌سنجی حکمرانی خوب به‌عنوان راهبرد پلیس، فصلنامه مطالعات حقوق عمومی دانشگاه تهران، 52(2)، صص 771-787
. doi: 10.22059/jplsq.2020.287884.2146
. شهریور، مهراب و حسین کلانتری خلیل‌آباد و غلامرضا لطیفی (1400) مدیریت شهرهای ایرانی-اسلامی با رویکرد شهر دانایی‌محور (مطالعه موردی: شهر شیراز)، مطالعات شهر ایرانی اسلامی، 12(45 )، صص 47-59
. فتحی، حمید و بهزاد ملک‌پور اصل و محمدحسین شریف‌زادگان (1394) حکمروایی خوب نهادسازی برای توسعه: آموزه‌هایی از سطح ملی تا شهری و تجربه‌ای از ایران، مرکز مطالعات و برنامه‌ریزی شهر تهران، تهران
. غفاری، مسعود و محمد رستم‌پور (1400) «نسبت تمرکزگرایی و حکمرانی خوب در دولت‌های نهم و دهم» پژوهش‌های سیاسی جهان اسلام بهار 1400 - شماره 38، صص 155-177
. doi: 20.1001.1.23222980.1400.11.1.4.2
. قربانیان، ماریا و محمد قهرمانی و محمود ابوالقاسمی (1400) شناسایی مؤلفه‌های حکمرانی خوب در نظام آموزش عالی ایران، اندیشه‌های نوین تربیتی، 17(1)، صص 53-82
. doi: 10.22051/jontoe.2020.31217.3037
. کلانتری خلیل‌آباد، حسین و مهدی حقی (1399) تحلیل نظام اجرایی طرح‌های نوسازی در بافت‌های فرسوده شهری با تأکید بر بافت فرسوده تهران؛ نمونه موردی: محلات صفا و شهید اسدی، مطالعات شهر ایرانی اسلامی، 11(41)، صص 5-14
. کاظمیان شیروان، غلامرضا و رضا واعظی و وجه‌الله قربانی‌زاده و محمدرضا رئیسی (1401) ارائه الگوی حکمروایی در مدیریت پایدار مصرف برق، فصلنامه پژوهش‌های سیاست‌گذاری و برنامه‌ریزی انرژی، ۸ (۴)، صص 106-147
. وافره کوهستانی م (1398) ارزیابی حکمرانی خوب شهری توسط شهرداری‌ها به‌منظور جلب مشارکت شهروندان، نشریه علمی رویکردهای پژوهشی نوین مدیریت و حسابداری، 3(10)، صص 57-65
. Retrieved از https: //majournal.ir/index.php/ma/article/view/233
. موسوی شفایی، سید مسعود و امیر کارگرسامانی و اسدالله کردنائیج و سید حمید خداداد حسینی (1400) سنجش حکمرانی خوب شهری برای شهرهای جهانی، پژوهش‌های مدیریت در ایران، 19(1)، صص 67-147
. doi:. 20.1001.1.2322200.1394.19.1.7.5
. مهری، معصومه و مصطفی ایستگلدی (1401) بررسی اثرات حکمروایی خوب شهری بر شکوفایی شهری در شهر شیراز، جغرافیا و روابط انسانی، (1) 5، صص 273-288
. doi: 10.22034/gahr.2022.330647.1668
. نعمتی، حسین و مصطفی انصاری (1400) حکمرانی خوب مقوله‌ای سیاسی در راستای تأمین سلامت (شرایط بحرانی کرونا)، سیاست کاربردی، 3(1)، ص 251
. doi: AP-2109-1026(R1)
. Adila, W. (2024) Mapping The Evolution of Good Governance: A Literature Review Perspective. Politeia: Journal of Public Administration and Political Science and International Relations, 2(1), 1-11. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.61978/politeia.v2i1.143
. Aina, Y. A. Wafer, A. Ahmed, F. & Alshuwaikhat, H. M. (2019). Top-down sustainable urban development? Urban governance transformation in Saudi Arabia. Cities, 90, 281-272. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.003
. Akhondzadeh-Noughabi, E. Alizadeh, S. Ahmadvand, A. M. & Minaei-Bidgoli, B. (2013). FTiS: A new model for effective urban management: A case study of urban systems in Iran. Cities, 31, 394-403. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2012.12.004
. Amiri, M. & Rouzbehani, K. (2014). A Revolutionary Look at Managing Big Complex Cities: The Case Study of Tehran. Management. 4(5): 123-130. doi: 10.5923/j.mm.20140405.03
. Arefi, M. (2013) Towards a conceptual framework for urban management: The Iranian experience. City, Culture and Society, 4(1), 37-48. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2012.11.010. Arszulowicz, M. (2025) Defining Good Governance: Praxeological Perspective. In Governance Strategies for Effective Sustainable Development (pp. 15-36). IGI Global
. Barakpou, N. & Keivani, R. M. (2016) The relationship between urban governance and sustainable urban development in Iran. Urban Change in Iran: Stories of Rooted Histories and Ever-accelerating Developments, 153-169
. Biswas, R. Jana, A. Arya, K. & Ramamritham, K. (2019). A good-governance framework for urban management. Journal of Urban Management, 8(2), 225-236. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2018.12.009
. Beshi, T. D. & Kaur, R. (2020) Public trust in local government: Explaining the role of good governance practices. Public Organization Review, 20(2), 337-350. DOI: 10.1007/s11115-019-00444-6
. Börzel, Tanja & Pamuk, Yasemin & Stahn, Andreas. (2008). The European Union and the Promotion of Good Governance in its Near Abroad. One Size Fits All? 1-37
. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https: //doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
. da Cruz, N. F. Rode, P. & McQuarrie, M. (2018) New urban governance: A review of current themes and future priorities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(1), 1–19. https: //doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1499416
. Dias, G. P. (2020) Global e-government development: besides the relative wealth of countries, do policies matter? Journals Transforming Government: People. Process and Policy, 14 (3), 390-397. DOI: 10.1108/TG-12-2019-0125
. Elliott, M. & Thomas, R. (2024) 10. Good Governance—An Introduction. Public Law
. Eneqvist, E. Algehed, J. Jensen, C. & Karvonen, A. (2022). Legitimacy in municipal experimental governance: questioning the public good in urban innovation practices. European Planning Studies, 30(8), 1596-1614. https: //doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.2015749
. Gisselquist, Rachel M. (2012) UNU World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER) Katajanokanlaituri 6 B, 00160 Helsinki, Finland
. Graham, M. Maloney, M. & Foth, M. (2023). A City of Good Ancestors: Urban Governance and Design from a Relationist Ethos. Designing More-than-Human Smart Cities: Beyond Sustainability, Towards Cohabitation. 239-266. DOI: 10.1093/9780191980060.003.0014
. Hendriks, F. (2014) Understanding good urban governance: essentials, shifts and values. Urban Affairs Review, 50(4), 553-576. DOI: 10.1177/1078087413511782
. Ishak, N. Hasibuan, R. R. & Arbani, T. S. (2020). Bureaucratic and Political Collaboration Towards a Good Governance System. Bestuur, 8(1), 19-26. DOI: 10.20961/bestuur.v8i1.42922
. Iftimoaei, C. (2015) GOOD GOVERNANCE: NORMATIVE VS. DESCRIPTIVE DIMENSION. SEA: Practical Application of Science, 309-316
. Karbaschi, G. (2013) The role of decision making processes in urban management systems: (case study of Tehran). (Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University)
. Kuo, N. L. Chen, T. Y. & Su, T. T. (2020). A new tool for urban governance or just rhetoric? The case of participatory budgeting in Taipei City. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 55(2), 125-140. DOI: 10.1002/ajs4.110
. Mansoor, M. (2021) Citizens' trust in government as a function of good governance and government agency's provision of quality information on social media during COVID-19. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101597
. Madanipour, A. (2011) Sustainable development, urban form, and megacity governance and planning in Tehran. Megacities: urban form, governance, and sustainability, 67-91. DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-99267-7_4
. Monavariyan, A. Nargesiyan, A. & Hosseini Makarem, A. (2019). Designing a Network Governance Model in Tehran Municipality. Journal of Urban Economics and Management, 7(27), 76-85. DOI: 20.1001.1.23452870.1398.7.27.6.6
. Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2020) The Rise and Fall of Good-Governance Promotion. Democracy, 31(1), 86-102. DOI: 10.1353/jod.2020.0007
. Omri, A. & Hadj, T. B. (2020) Foreign investment and air pollution: do good governance and technological innovation matter? Environmental research, 185, 109469. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109469
. Omri, A. Kahia, M. & Kahouli, B. (2021) Does good governance moderate the financial development-CO2 emissions relationship? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(34), 471516-47503. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-14014-1
. Oxford Economics. (2024) Global Cities Index 2024. Oxford Economics
. Pourkarimi, E. , zibakalam, S. , Noroozi, N. and Ebtekar, M. (2016) A Conceptual Model for Integrated Management of the Urban Environment in Tehran Metropolis (Based on the Good Governance Guidelines). International Journal of Environmental Research, 10(3), 391-400. doi: 10.22059/ijer.2016.58758
. World Bank. (2023) Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI). The World Bank Group
. Saeidi Rezvani, N. Razavi, N. Mohammad, S. & Rashtiyan, S. M. (2023) Investigating the status of good urban governance indicators and their impact on urban regeneration (Case study of the worn texture of Semnan city). Spatial Planning
. Sadeghzadeh, S. Golkar, K. & Ghaffari, A. (2018) Tools for the Governance of urban design: the Tehran experience. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 11(22), 69-80
. Safkaur, O. Afiah, N. N. Poulus, S. & Dahlan, M. (2019) The effect of quality financial reporting on good governance. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 9(3), 277. DOI: 10.32479/ijefi.8047
. Siraki, G. K. & Neginraz, P. (2020) Challenges of the Iranian government in smartening cities by emphasizing the model of good governance: Case study of Tehran. Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, 4(2), 9-25. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.25019/scrd.v4i2.69
. Salam, M. A. (2013) E-Governance for Good Governance through Public Service Delivery, Master's Thesis of Arts in Governance and Development, Institute of Governance Studies, BRAC University, Bangladesh
. Zainal Alim Adiwijaya, E. S. (2020) Good governance of zakat institutions: A literature review. DOI: 10.35741/issn.0258-2724.55.2.38
.