مطالعۀ تطبیقی جایگاه رواق در سازمان فضایی مسجد امام اصفهان و مسجد سلطان احمد استانبول به کمک تکنیک نحو فضا
محورهای موضوعی : معماری اسلامی
یاسمن غلامی
1
*
,
محسن كاملي
2
1 - دانشجوی دکتری، گروه معماری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد ساوه، ایران
2 - استادیار، گروه معماری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد ساوه، ایران
کلید واژه: معماری دورۀ اسلامی, رواق, سازمان فضایی, مسجد امام و مسجد سلطان احمد.,
چکیده مقاله :
مساجد به اصلیترین کاربری در تمام قلمروهایی تبدیل شدند که اسلام در آنها ظهور کرد. بنایی مشترک برای کارکردهایی یکسان، اما در سرزمینهایی گوناگون. دو امپراتوریِ همسایه و همزمان عثمانی و صفوی، دو فرهنگ تأثیرگذار بر معماری دورۀ اسلامی بودند که در مساجد آنها، واحدهای فضایی مشترکی دیده میشود. هدف اصلی این مقاله، تبیین شباهت و تفاوت نقش رواق به عنوان واحد فضایی نیمهباز و مشترک در سازماندهی فضایی مسجد امام اصفهان و مسجد سلطان احمد استانبول است. این پژوهش برای دستیابی به هدف یادشده به روش ترکیبی (کمی و کیفی) انجام شده است. در گام نخست با رویکرد کمّی، جایگاه رواق در سازمان فضایی مساجد انتخابی به کمک تکنیک نحو فضا و در قالب مؤلفههای کمّی مشخص شد. در گام دوم با روش کیفی و راهبرد استدلال منطقی، کمیتهای استخراجشده در بررسی تطبیقی با یکدیگر مقایسه و نتایج پژوهش استخراج شد. یافتههای پژوهش نشان میدهد که در سازماندهی فضایی مسجد سلطان احمد، رواقها، فضاهای عمومی و ارتباطی هستند؛ زیرا با فضاهای پیرامونی خود ارتباطی قوی داشته، تمایل به یکپارچه شدن با کلیت سازمان فضایی دارند و از دیگر سو، در مسیرهای ارتباطی میان بخشهای مختلف مسجد، حضور دارند و فضاهای واسط و ارتباطی محسوب میشوند. در سازماندهی فضایی مسجد امام، رواقها، فضاهایی خصوصی و ساکن هستند؛ زیرا فاقد ارتباط قوی با فضاهای پیرامونی و همجوار خود بوده، نسبت به کلیت سازمان فضایی، تمایل به منفک شدن از بخشهای مختلف مسجد دارند. از دیگر سو در مسیرهای ارتباطی میان بخشهای مختلف مسجد حضور نداشته، فضاهای واسط محسوب نمیشوند. در نتیجه درک عمیقتری از رواقها به عنوان فضاهای نیمهباز و جایگاه آنها در سازمان فضایی مساجد امام اصفهان و سلطان احمد استانبول، ضروری است؛ زیرا طبق یافتههای مقاله، علیرغم ویژگیهای کالبدی مشابه رواقها در هر دو مسجد، نقش و کارکرد آنها در سازمان فضایی و کیفیت ارتباطشان با بخشهای مختلف مسجد به صورت چشمگیری متفاوت است.
وجوه اشتراک: ۱- دارای شاخص عمق کوتاه و ارتباط نزدیک با ورودی مسجد ۲- دارای شاخص عمق میانگین پایینی و دسترسیپذیری راحت از بخشهای مختلف مسجد به علت همجواری رواقها با حیاط.
وجوه افتراق: ۱- کمیت یکپارچگی و انتخاب بالا در مسجد سلطان احمد و عملکرد به صورت فضاهای عمومی و ارتباطی و مؤثر در یکپارچهسازی کلیت سازمان فضایی مسجد 2- کمیت یکپارچگی و انتخاب پایین در مسجد و عملکرد به صورت فضاهای خصوصی و ساکن و متمایل به منفک شدن از کلیت سازمان فضایی. بنابراین ماهیت عملکردی رواقها در مسجد امام بهشدت محدود و مستقل است و در فعالیتهای دیگر فضاهای مسجد، از جمله فضاهای اصلی شامل گنبدخانهها و شبستانها، نقشی ایفا نمیکنند و نقش کمرنگی در کلیت سازمان فضایی مسجد ایفا میکنند.
در مجموع از یافتههای مقاله میتوان نتیجه گرفت که معماری اسلامی در سرزمینهای گوناگون علیرغم شباهتهای کالبدی و استفاده از عناصر مشترک، همچنان دارای تفاوتهای آشکاری است. این تفاوتها بهویژه در چگونگی بهرهبرداری از فضاهایی با کالبدهای مشابه قابل مشاهده است.
Comparative Study of the Role of Porticos in the Spatial Organization of Imam Mosque in Isfahan and Sultan Ahmed Mosque in Istanbul Using Spatial Syntax Technique
Yasaman Gholami*
Mohsen Kameli**
Mosques have become the primary function in all the realms where Islam has emerged. They serve as a common structure for similar functions, yet they exist in diverse territories. The neighboring and contemporary empires of the Ottoman and Safavid were two influential cultures in Islamic architecture, where common spatial units are observed in their mosques. The primary aim of this article is to elucidate the similarities and differences in the role of the portico as a semi-open and shared spatial unit in the spatial organization of Imam Mosque in Isfahan and Sultan Ahmed Mosque in Istanbul. This study employs a mixed-method approach (quantitative and qualitative) to achieve this objective. In the first step, a quantitative approach was adopted to delineate the position of the portico in the spatial organization of the selected mosques using spatial syntax techniques and through quantitative components. In the second step, a qualitative method with logical reasoning strategies was employed to compare the extracted quantities in a comparative analysis and derive the research outcomes. The findings indicate that in the spatial organization of Sultan Ahmed Mosque, porticos function as public and communicative spaces, maintaining a strong relationship with their surrounding environments. They tend to integrate with the overall spatial organization and serve as connecting and intermediary spaces among various sections of the mosque. Conversely, in the spatial organization of Imam Mosque, porticos are characterized as private and static spaces, lacking a strong connection with their surrounding areas and showing a tendency to detach from different parts of the mosque. Additionally, they do not exist in the communication paths between the various sections of the mosque and are not considered intermediary spaces. Therefore, a deeper understanding of porticos as semi-open spaces and their role in the spatial organization of Imam Mosque in Isfahan and Sultan Ahmed Mosque in Istanbul is essential. According to the findings of this article, despite the similar physical attributes of the porticos in both mosques, their roles, functions, and the quality of their connections with different sections of the mosque are significantly different.
Keywords: Islamic period architecture, portico, spatial organization, Imam Mosque, Sultan Ahmed Mosque.
Common Aspects:
- Characterized by short depth indices and a close relationship with the mosque entrance.
- Display low average depth indices and easy accessibility from various parts of the mosque due to the adjacency of the porticos to the courtyard.
Differentiating Aspects:
- High integration and choice quantity in Sultan Ahmed Mosque, functioning as public and communicative spaces, effective in unifying the overall spatial organization of the mosque.
- Low integration and choice quantity in Imam Mosque, functioning as private and static spaces with a tendency to detach from the overall spatial organization. Therefore, the functional nature of porticos in Imam Mosque is significantly limited and independent, playing a minimal role in the activities of other spaces within the mosque, including the primary areas such as the dome rooms and prayer halls, and they have a subdued presence in the overall spatial organization of the mosque.
In conclusion, the findings of this article suggest that Islamic architecture, despite physical similarities and shared elements across different territories, manifests clear differences. These differences, particularly in the utilization of similarly structured spaces, are notably observable.
Introduction
Comparative study of architecture in various Islamic lands, particularly in mosques, is of utmost importance. The Ottoman and Safavid empires stand out as two unique paradigms of influential architectural and cultural significance in the early modern Islamic world (Casale, 2023: 230). The position of these two empires in Islamic architecture, along with their geographical proximity and contemporaneous existence, creates a suitable context for the comparative study of Islamic architecture. The use of similar spatial units in the mosques of the Ottoman and Safavid empires calls for an examination of the role of each of these units in the spatial organization of the mosques.
The comparative study of these spaces is essential for analyzing their commonalities and differences from two perspectives: firstly, to determine the significance of these shared spatial units in mosque architecture. Secondly, this comparative examination of common spaces in the architecture of various Islamic countries represents an important step toward forming a comprehensive understanding of Islamic architecture.
Objectives and Questions
Objective: To elucidate the similarities and differences in the role of the portico as a semi-open and common spatial unit in the spatial organization of Imam Mosque in Isfahan and Sultan Ahmed Mosque in Istanbul. Question: Considering the presence of the portico as a semi-open spatial unit in both mosques, what similarities and differences exist in its role within the spatial organization of the selected mosques?
Methods
The research methodology employed in this study is of a mixed-methods nature (both quantitative and qualitative). the research literature was examined through the study of written sources and visual documents to analyze different spaces and their interrelations. In the second step, spatial syntax techniques were utilized to analyze the position and spatial relationships of porticos with other spaces by constructing justification graphs. During this phase, quantitative data were extracted and compiled from the relevant software (Aghraph) to assess key parameters such as depth, average depth, control index, connectivity, and choice. Subsequently, by comparing the quantitative data from both mosques and aligning it with the plans and physical characteristics, the similarities and differences in the role of the portico within the spatial organization of the two mosques were identified.
Resuls
Quantitative data regarding the spaces of each mosque and their alignment with plans and
spatial characteristics reveal that in Imam Mosque, the porticos are relatively private spaces that tend to be segregated from the various sections of the mosque. This is also applicable to the surrounding and adjacent areas of the porticos, indicating a weak connection between the porticos and their surrounding buildings. According to the plan, the porticos are almost devoid of direct connections with any other semi-open or enclosed spaces. To access the porticos from any space, one must first enter the courtyard and then reach the porticos; the connected corridors to the vestibule are the only areas that have a direct connection with the porticos, evidencing a strong relationship with the entrance and being closer to the entrance compared to other main mosque spaces (such as iwans, prayer halls, and domed areas). On the other hand, the proximity of the porticos to the courtyard and access to it have resulted in a short pathway between the porticos and other spaces despite their private nature and weak connection to the surrounding buildings (as indicated by the mean depth index), with the courtyard serving as a mediating space between them.
In contrast, the Sultan Ahmed Mosque porticos function as public spaces. The northern and southern porticos maintain a strong connection with their surrounding spaces, whereas this connection is weaker for the eastern and western porticos. The access pathways from different sections of the mosque to the northern, eastern, and western porticos are short, allowing easy access from various areas. This is due to the fact that these semi-open spaces are adjacent to the central courtyard, allowing for easy transition from the domed area and affiliated spaces to the porticos after entry into the courtyard. Moreover, the four porticos are interconnected, facilitating easy access among them.
Conclusion
Islamic architecture across various regions, despite its structural similarities and use of common elements, exhibits notable differences. These differences are especially apparent in the utilization of spaces with similar forms. They are influenced not only by the unique architectural characteristics of each structure but also by the historical and cultural contexts of the Ottoman and Safavid empires.
despite the similar physical features of the porticos in both mosques, their roles and functions within the spatial organization, as well as their interactions with various sections of the mosque, vary significantly.
Commonalities:
- having a short depth index, indicating their proximity to the mosque's entrance, which facilitates the connection between the entrance and the courtyard.
- having a low average depth, ensuring easy accessibility from different areas of the mosque due to their adjacency to the courtyard.
Differences:
In the Ottoman mosque, the porticos function as public and connective spaces (high degree of integration). Their public nature arises from their strong connections to surrounding areas and various sections of the mosque, playing a crucial role in integrating the overall spatial organization. This means that the presence of porticos enhances continuity and cohesion among different sections of the mosque. These porticos not only serve as intermediaries between the courtyard and the mosque entrances but also act as pre-entrances for the dome area, facilitating movement between various points within mosque.
Conversely, in the Imam Mosque, the porticos are recognized as private and static spaces (low degree of integration). Their privacy stems from the lack of strong connections with surrounding spaces and sections of the mosque, reflecting a tendency toward separation from the overall spatial organization. Thus, when considering the entire mosque within a unified spatial framework, the porticos do not significantly contribute to the continuity and cohesion among its various sections. Consequently, it can be concluded that the functional nature of the porticos in the Imam Mosque is highly limited and independent, lacking any role in the activities of other main areas and they cannot be classified as public spaces.
The static nature of the porticos can be attributed to access to the courtyard being facilitated through the corners of these porticos. Compared to the porticos of the Sultan Ahmed Mosque, this function as a pre-entrance to the courtyard is significantly diminished. Furthermore, the porticos in the Imam Mosque do not serve as entrances to any of the main spaces, like the dome hall, and they do not occupy positions within the access routes among different areas.
Such differences lead to a minimal movement quality in the porticos of the Imam Mosque, classifying them as static spaces.
References
Ettinghausen, Richard and Alexander Grabar (2004) Islamic art and architecture (Vol. 1), translated by Yaghoob Azhend, Tehran, Organization for the Study and Compilation of Humanities Books (SAMT). [in persian]
ISBN 9789644594120
Sterling, Henry (2002) Encyclopedia of world architecture, translated by Nader Roozrokh, Tehran, Farhangian. [in persian]
ISBN 9645558298
Omidvari, Somayeh, Mahdi Hamzehnejad, and Elham Omidvari (2020) "Analysis of the typology of semi-open spatial elements in Islamic houses (Comparative study of Yazd houses (Qajar period) and Damascus houses (Ottoman period))," Iranian Islamic City Studies, Vol. 11, No. 42, pp. 85-19. [in persian]
Dor: 20.1001.1.2228639.1399.11.42.2.3
Besharati, Mohammad and Mehrdad Qayoumi Bidhandi (2009) Iranian architectural encyclopedia in Persian references, Volume 1: Terms and Concepts, Tehran, Matn. [in persian]
ISBN 9467007523
Pope, Arthur Upham (2003) Architecture of Iran, Tehran, Akhtarān. [in persian]
Hajghasemi, Kamal (1996) Ganjnameh, Volume 2: Mosques of Isfahan, Tehran, Roozaneh. [in persian]
ISBN 9789644572838
Haeri Mazandarani, Mohammad Reza (2016) Home, Culture, Nature in Iranian Architecture, Tehran, Urban and Architectural Studies Research Center. [in persian]
ISBN 9786009018291
Heydari, Ali Akbar, Ghasemian Asl, Eisa and Maryam Kiai (2017) "Analysis of the spatial structure of traditional Iranian houses using spatial syntax (Case study: Comparison of houses in Yazd, Kashan, and Isfahan)," Iranian Islamic City Studies, Vol. 7, No. 28, pp. 33-21. [in persian]
https://sid.ir/paper/505298/fa
Dickey, Francis (2016) Architecture Form, Space, Order, translated by Scientific Educational Group of Specialized Architecture Academy, Tehran, Soroush Danesh. [in persian]
ISBN 9786007099131
Zekavat, Kamran (2011) "The role of spatial organization in urban design," Safeh, Vol. 21, No. 54, pp. 107. [in persian]
Dor: 20.1001.1.1683870.1390.21.3.8.0
Razjou, Mehrdad, Matin, Mehrdad and Aqil Imamgholi (2020) "Analysis of the impact of physical elements of rural housing in West Gilan on performance efficiency using spatial syntax method," Armanesh Architecture and Urbanism, Vol. 13, No. 32, pp. 97-83. [in persian]
Doi: 10.22034/aaud.2020.135117.1568
Rafizadeh, Neda, Rafiei Sarashki, Bijan and Ali Mohammad Ranjbar Kermani (2004) Culture of Mehrazzi (Architecture), Iran, Tehran, Road and Housing Research Center. [in persian]
ISBN 9789647404020
Omidi, Hassan (1984) Omidi Culture, Tehran, Amir Kabir. [in persian]
ISBN 9789640001790
Kazemi, Leila, Akbari Namdar, Shabnam, Mousavi, Mirsaeid and Hassan Sattar Sarabani (2018) "Comparative study of the geometry of Imam Mosque in Isfahan and Suleymaniye Mosque in Istanbul based on archetypal concepts," Journal of Architecture in Hot and Dry Climate, Vol. 6, No. 8, pp. 138-119. [in persian]
Dor: 20.1001.1.26453711.1397.6.8.6.6
Taghipour, Maliheh, Heydari, Ali Akbar and Fatemeh Kakaei (2023) "Investigating the concept of spatial value in traditional Iranian houses based on two factors: lifestyle and space differences (Case study: Afshar House in Shiraz)," Journal of Architecture in Hot and Dry Climate, Vol. 11, No. 17, pp. 101-81. [in persian]
Doi: 10.22034/ahdc.2022.2765
Qayoumi Bidhandi, Mehrdad (2008) "The gardens of Khorasan in the history of Beyhaqi," Safeh, Vol. 46, No. 17, pp. 28-5. [in persian]
Kabir Saber, Mohammad Baqer, Mazaherian, Hamed and Mahnaz Piravi (2014) "Morphology of the Kaboud Mosque in Tabriz," Iranian Architecture Studies, Vol. 3, No. 6, pp. 23-5. [in persian]
https://jias.kashanu.ac.ir/article_111729.html
Madahi, Seyed Mahdi and Gholamhossein Memarian (2016) "Analysis of the spatial configuration of vernacular houses using spatial syntax (Case study: Bashrouyeh City)," Housing and Rural Environment, Vol. 35, No. 156, pp. 66-49. [in persian]
http://jhre.ir/article-۱-۸۴۶-fa.html
Memarian, Gholamhossein (2002) "Syntax of architectural space," Safeh, Vol. 12, No. 35, pp. 83-74. [in persian]
DOR: 20.1001.1.1683870.1381.12.4.1.2
Molaei Shams, Vajieh, Razavani, Alireza and Majid Mirzavaziri (2021) "Application and expansion of graph theory in spatial syntax methods to develop a practical model for analysis in architecture," Restoration and Architecture in Iran, Vol. 11, No. 25, pp. 36-15. [in persian]
Doi: 10.52547/mmi.1646.13990231
Mousavi, Seyed Mohsen and Mahya Ghochani (2022) "The impact of Qibla direction on movement hierarchy in mosques with a focus on Iranian-Islamic architectural styles," Islamic Architecture Research, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 58-45. [in persian]
Doi: 10.52547/jria.9.4.4
Mousavi, Mahmoud (1996) "The earthen memorial of Khwaja Zabol and a summary of the results of studies and excavations conducted there," in Proceedings of the Congress on the History of Iranian Architecture and Urbanism, edited by Bagher Ayatollahzadeh Shirazi, Tehran, Iran Cultural Heritage Organization. [in persian]
Miraselami, Mahsa and Ali Omranipour (2022) "The role of spatial organization indices on sociality, emphasizing physical-functional factors in mosques of Qazvin City," City Identity, Vol. 16, No. 51, pp. 32-17. [in persian]
Hedayati, Fatemeh, Sohili, Jamaluddin and Kamal Rahbari Manesh (2022) "Explaining the relationship between intermediary spaces and environmental legibility in the congregational mosques of the Seljuk period using spatial syntax," Journal of Islamic Civilization History Research, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 274-249. [in persian]
Doi: 10.22059/jhic.2023.353887.654394
Yousefnia Pasha, Majid and Maria Barzegar (2018) "Evaluating the role and effectiveness of Refaq (Iwan) from the perspective of users: semi-open space in rural houses of Mazandaran," Housing and Rural Environment, Vol. 37, No. 161, pp. 77-92. Anar, Gürkan (2022) Isfahan and Istanbul in the early seventeenth century: Masjed-e Shah and Sultan Ahmed complexes, PhD Thesis of Boğaziçi University. [in persian]
https://www.academia.edu/91501761
Casale, Sinem Arcak (2023) Gifts in the age of empire: Ottoman-Safavid cultural exchange, 1500–1639, University of Chicago Press.
ISBN 9780226820422
Freely, John (2011) A history of Ottoman architecture, WIT Press.
ISBN 9781845645069
Güngörürler, Selim (2024) the Ottoman empire and safavid iran, 1639–1682: diplomacy and Borderlands in theearly Modern Middle east, Edinburgh University Press.
ISBN 9781399510103
Hillier, Bill (2007) Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture, Space Syntax.
ISBN 9780521560399
Hillier, Bill, & Hanson, Julienne (1989) The social logic of space, Cambridge university press.
ISBN 9780521367844
Khanzadeh, Masoumeh (2024) Aesthetic and functional analysis of mosque entrance areas in Ottoman and Safavid Empires: a comparative study, Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11 (1).
Doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2313262
Manum, Bendik (2009) A-graph complementary software for axial-line analysis, In Proceedings of the 7th international space syntax symposium (Vol. 70, p. 1), Stockholm: KTH.
ISBN 9789174153477
Mustafa, Faris Ali, Hassan, Ahmad Sanusi, & Baper, Salahaddin Yasin (2010) Using space syntax analysis in detecting privacy: a comparative study of traditional and modern house layouts in Erbil city, Iraq, Asian Social Science, 6(8)., 157.
Doi: 10.5539/ass.v6n8p157
Namiri, Mahsa Esmaeili, & Sani, Rafooneh Mokhtarshahi (2017) Symbolic Meaning of Colours in Safavid and Ottoman Mosques, Journal of Shi'a Islamic Studies, 10, 91-123.
Doi: 10.1353/isl.2017.0003
Nasution, Irham Walad, & Demirarslan, Deniz (2024) Comparative analysis of mosque spatial features in Turkey and Indonesia, Türk & İslam Dünyası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11 (40), 1-50.
Doi: 10.29228/TIDSAD.75291
Nourian, Pirouz (2016) Configraphics: graph theoretical methods for design and analysis of spatial configurations, A+ BE| Architecture and the Built Environment, (14), 1-348.
Doi: 10.7480/abe.2016.14.1383
Haj Vaziri, Alireza, Goodarzparvari, Parnaz, & Baniardalan, Ismail (2021) comparative body analysis of Sheikh Lotfollah Mosque in Isfahan and Ahmed Mosque in Istanbul, Journal of Islamic Architecture, 6 (3).
Doi: 10.18860/jia.v6i3.10112
* Corresponding Author: Ph.D Student, Department of Architecture, Islamic Azad University, Saveh Branch, Iran.
yasamangho2@gmail.com
ORCID: 0000-0002-3692-3435
** Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Islamic Azad University, Saveh Branch, Iran.
kameli@live.com
ORCID: 0000-0001-9592-6882
اتینگهاوزن، ریچارد و الگ گرابار (۱۳۸۳) هنر و معماری اسلامی (۱)، ترجمه یعقوب آژند، تهران، سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاهها (سمت). ISBN 9789644594120.
استیرلن، هانری (۱۳۸۱) دائرهالمعارف معماری جهان، ترجمه نادر روزرخ، تهران، فرهنگان. ISBN 9645558298.
امیدواری، سمیه و مهدی حمزهنژاد و الهام امیدواری (۱۳۹۹) «تحلیلی بر گونهشناسی عناصر فضایی نیمهباز در معماری خانههای اسلامی (بررسی تطبیقی خانههای یزد (دوره قاجاری) و خانههای دمشق (دوره عثمانی))»، مطالعات شهر ایرانی اسلامی، سال یازدهم، شماره ۴۲، صص 19-۸۵. Dor: 20.1001.1.2228639.1399.11.42.2.3.
بهشتی، محمد و مهرداد قیومی بیدهندی (۱۳۸۸) فرهنگنامۀ معماری ایران در مراجع فارسی، جلد اول: اصطلاحات و مفاهیم، تهران، متن. ISBN 9467007523.
پوپ، آرتور اپهام (۱۳۸۲) معماری ایران، تهران، اختران.
حاج قاسمی، کامبیز (۱۳۷۵) گنجنامه، دفتر دوم: مساجد اصفهان، تهران، روزنه. ISBN 9789644572838.
حائری مازندرانی، محمدرضا (۱۳۹۵) خانه، فرهنگ، طبیعت در معماری ایرانی، تهران، مرکز مطالعاتی و تحقیقاتی شهرسازی و معماری. ISBN 9786009018291.
حیدری، علیاکبر و عیسی قاسمیان اصل و مریم کیایی (1396) «تحلیل ساختار فضایی خانههای سنتی ایران با استفاده از روش نحو فضا (مطالعه موردی: مقایسه خانههای یزد، کاشان و اصفهان)»، مطالعات شهر ایرانی اسلامی، سال هفتم، شماره 28، صص 21-33. https://sid.ir/paper/505298/fa. دیکیچینگ، فرانسیس (۱۳۹۵) معماری فرم، فضا، نظم، ترجمۀ گروه علمی آموزشی آکادمی تخصصی معماری، تهران، سروش دانش. ISBN 9786007099131.
ذکاوت، کامران (1390) «جایگاه سازمان فضایی در طراحی شهری»، صفه، سال بیست¬ویکم، شماره 54، ص 107. Dor: 20.1001.1.1683870.1390.21.3.8.0.
رازجو، مهرداد و متین، مهرداد و عقیل امامقلی (1399) «واکاوی تأثیرگذاری عناصر کالبدی مسکن روستایی غرب گیلان در راندمان عملکردی با استفاده از روش نحو فضا»، معماری و شهرسازی آرمانشهر، سال سیزدهم، شماره 32، صص 83-97. Doi: 10.22034/aaud.2020.135117.1568.
رفیعزاده، ندا و بیژن رفیعی سرشکی و علیمحمد رنجبر کرمانی (۱۳۸۳) فرهنگ مهرازی (معماری)، ایران، تهران، مرکز تحقیقات راه و مسکن. ISBN 9789647404020.
عمید، حسن (۱۳۶۳) فرهنگ عمید، تهران، امیرکبیر. ISBN 9789640001790.
کاظمی، لیلا و اکبری نامدار، شبنم، موسوی، میرسعید و حسن ستار ساربانقلی (1397) «مقایسه تطبیقی هندسه مسجد امام اصفهان و مسجد سلیمانیه استانبول بر اساس مفاهیم کهنالگویی»، نشریه معماری اقلیم گرم و خشک، سال ششم، شماره 8، صص 119-138. Dor: 20.1001.1.26453711.1397.6.8.6.6.
تقیپور، ملیحه و علیاکبر حیدری و فاطمه کاکایی (1402) «بررسی مفهوم ارزش فضایی در خانههای سنتی ایران بر اساس دو عامل شیوه زندگی و تفاوت فضا (نمونه موردی: خانه افشاریان شیراز)»، نشریه معماری اقلیم گرم و خشک، سال یازدهم، شماره 17، صص 81-101. Doi: 10.22034/ahdc.2022.2765.
قیومی بیدهندی، مهرداد (۱۳۸۷) «باغهای خراسان در تاریخ بیهقی»، صفه، سال چهلوششم، شماره ۱۷، صص ۵-۲۸. Dor: 20.1001.1.1683870.1387.17.2.1.7.
کبیر صابر، محمدباقر و حامد مظاهریان و مهناز پیروی (۱۳۹۳) «ریختشناسی معماری مسجد کبود تبریز»، مطالعات معماری ایران، سال سوم، شماره ۶، صص 5-۶ و۲۳. https://jias.kashanu.ac.ir/article_111729.html.
مداحی، سید مهدی و غلامحسین معماریان (1395) «تجزیهوتحلیل پیکرهبندی فضایی خانههای بومی با رویکرد نحو فضا (نمونه موردی: شهر بشرویه)»، مسکن و محیط روستا، سال سی¬وپنجم، شماره 156، صص 49-66. http://jhre.ir/article-۱-۸۴۶-fa.html.
معماریان، غلامحسین (1381) «نحو فضای معماری»، صفه، سال دوازدهم، شماره 35، صص 74-۸۳. Dor: 20.1001.1.1683870.1381.12.4.1.2.
ملایی شمس، وجیهه و علیرضا رضوانی و مجید میرزاوزیری (1400) «کاربرد و بسط نظریه گراف در روش نحو فضا تدوین مدل کاربردی تحلیل در معماری»، مرمت و معماری ایران، سال یازدهم، شماره 25، صص 15-36. Doi: 10.52547/mmi.1646.13990231.
موسوی، سید محسن و محیا قوچانی (1401) «تأثیر جهت قبله بر سلسله¬مراتب حرکتی در مساجد با واکاوی در سبکهای معماری ایرانی- اسلامی»، پژوهشهای معماری اسلامی، سال نهم، شماره 4، صص 45-58. Doi:10.52547/jria.9.4.4.
موسوی، محمود (۱۳۷۵) «یادمان خشتی کوه خواجۀ زابل و خلاصهای از نتایج مطالعات و کاوش¬های انجامشده در آن»، در مجموعهمقالات کنگرۀ تاریخ معماری و شهرسازی ایران، به کوشش باقر آیتاللهزادۀ شیرازی، تهران، سازمان میراث فرهنگی کشور.
میراسلامی، مهسا و علی عمرانیپور (۱۴۰۱) «نقش شاخص های سازمان فضایی بر میزان اجتماع پذیری، باتأکید بر عوامل کالبدی- عملکردی در مساجد شهر قزوین»، هویت شهر، سال شانزدهم، شماره ۵۱، صص ۱۷-۳۲. Doi: 10.30495/hoviatshahr.2022.58576.11938.
هادیپور مرادی، سهیلا و مژگان هادیپور مرادی (۱۳۹۵) «تجلی باورهای دینی و مذهبی در آثار معماری ایران و عثمانی، مسجد شیخ لطفالله اصفهان و مسجد سلیمانیه استانبول»، مطالعات تاریخ اسلام، شماره ۳۰، صص 199-۲۲۵. Dor: 20.1001.1.22286713.1395.8.30.10.2.
هدایتی، فاطمه و جمالالدین سهیلی و کمال رهبریمنش (1401) «تبیین رابطه فضاهای بینابین با خوانایی محیط در مساجد جامع دوران سلجوقی به روش نحو فضا»، پژوهشنامه تاریخ تمدن اسلامی، سال پنجاه¬وپنجم، شماره 1، صص 249-274. Doi: 10.22059/jhic.2023.353887.654394.
یوسفنیا پاشا، مجید و ماریا برزگر (۱۳۹۷) «ارزیابی نقش و کارآیی رفاق (ایوان) از دیدگاه استفادهکنندگان: فضای نیمه باز در خانههای روستایی مازندران»، مسکن و محیط روستا، سال سیوهفتم، شماره ۱۶۱، صص ۹۲-۷۷. DOI: 10.22034/37.161.77.
Anar, Gürkan (2022) Isfahan and Istanbul in the early seventeenth century: Masjed-e Shah and Sultan Ahmed complexes, PhD Thesis of Boğaziçi University. https://www.academia.edu/91501761.
Casale, Sinem Arcak (2023) Gifts in the age of empire: Ottoman-Safavid cultural exchange, 1500–1639, University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226820422.
Freely, John (2011) A history of Ottoman architecture, WIT Press. ISBN 9781845645069.
Güngörürler, Selim (2024) the Ottoman empire and safavid iran, 1639–1682: diplomacy and Borderlands in theearly Modern Middle east, Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 9781399510103.
Hillier, Bill (2007) Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture, Space Syntax. ISBN 9780521560399.
Hillier, Bill, & Hanson, Julienne (1989) The social logic of space, Cambridge university press. ISBN 9780521367844.
Khanzadeh, Masoumeh (2024) Aesthetic and functional analysis of mosque entrance areas in Ottoman and Safavid Empires: a comparative study, Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1). Doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2313262.
Manum, Bendik (2009) A-graph complementary software for axial-line analysis, In Proceedings of the 7th international space syntax symposium (Vol. 70, p. 1), Stockholm: KTH. ISBN 9789174153477.
Mustafa, Faris Ali, Hassan, Ahmad Sanusi, & Baper, Salahaddin Yasin (2010) Using space syntax analysis in detecting privacy: a comparative study of traditional and modern house layouts in Erbil city, Iraq, Asian Social Science, 6(8)., 157. Doi: 10.5539/ass.v6n8p157.
Namiri, Mahsa Esmaeili, & Sani, Rafooneh Mokhtarshahi (2017) Symbolic Meaning of Colours in Safavid and Ottoman Mosques, Journal of Shi'a Islamic Studies, 10, 91-123. Doi: 10.1353/isl.2017.0003.
Nasution, Irham Walad, & Demirarslan, Deniz (2024) Comparative analysis of mosque spatial features in Turkey and Indonesia, Türk & İslam Dünyası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11 (40), 1-50. Doi: 10.29228/TIDSAD.75291.
Nourian, Pirouz (2016) Configraphics: graph theoretical methods for design and analysis of spatial configurations, A+ BE| Architecture and the Built Environment, (14), 1-348. Doi: 10.7480/abe.2016.14.1383.
Haj Vaziri, Alireza, Goodarzparvari, Parnaz, & Baniardalan, Ismail (2021) comparative body analysis of Sheikh Lotfollah Mosque in Isfahan and Ahmed Mosque in Istanbul, Journal of Islamic Architecture, 6(3). Doi: 10.18860/jia.v6i3.10112.
URL1: https://itto.org/iran/itemgallery/shah-mosque-isfahan.
URL2: https://loibosphorus.com/the-blue-mosque-a-jewel-of-istanbuls-skyline.
URL3: .https://itto.org/iran/attraction/shah-mosque-isfahan.
URL4: https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/Blue_Mosque,_Istanbul.
URL5: https://www.epersianhotel.com/mag/isfahan.
URL6: https://rfab.uk/arcade-sultan-ahmed-mosque-istanbul.