ساختیابی الگوهای معماری خانههای کرمانشاه (از دهه 60 تاکنون)
محورهای موضوعی : کاربست پایههای شهرسازی و معماری اسلامی در معماری معاصر
معین آقایی مهر
1
,
مینو قره بگلو
2
*
,
محمدتقی پیربابایی
3
1 - استادیار گروه معماری و شهرسازی، دانشکده مهندسی عمران و معماری، دانشگاه ملی مهارت، تهران، ایران
2 - استاد دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اسلامی تبریز، تبریز، ایران
3 - استاد دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اسلامی تبریز، تبریز، ایران
کلید واژه: آنتونی گیدنز, نظریه ساختیابی, کرمانشاه, معماری مسکونی و مطالعات مسکن.,
چکیده مقاله :
نظریه ساختیابی «آنتونی گیدنز» با تمرکز بر کنش اجتماعی و قواعد و منابع ساخت، چارچوبی مناسب برای تبیین فرایند تولید و بازتولید فضاهای مسکونی فراهم میآورد. این پژوهش با اتکا به نظریۀ ساختیابی، به تحلیل مؤلفههای ساخت معماری فضاهای مسکونی معاصر شهر کرمانشاه در دهههای اخیر میپردازد. پرسش اصلی پژوهش اینگونه شکل گرفته است که شرایط حاکم بر فضاهای مسکونی معاصر شهر کرمانشاه چگونه است و این شرایط، چگونه با تحولات مؤلفههای ساخت فضاهای مسکونی قابل تفسیر است.
روش پژوهش، توصیفی - تحلیلی و مبتنی بر راهبرد پسکاوی است و از روشهای مطالعه موردی، تطبیقی و تحلیل محتوای کیفی به صورت نظامدار بهره میبرد. یافتههای پژوهش نشان میدهد که تحولات معماری مسکن در کرمانشاه از دهه ۶۰ تاکنون، نتیجۀ تعامل پیچیده میان منابع اقتداری و تخصیصی، الزامات قانونی، مفاهیم و ارزشهای اخلاقی مرتبط با سکونت است. بر این اساس الگوهای غالب فضاهای مسکونی به چهار گونۀ ویلایی اولیه، ویلایی متأخر، آپارتمانی اولیه و آپارتمانی متأخر دستهبندی میگردد. نتایج بیانگر آن است که فضاهای سکونتی کرمانشاه نه صرفاً به وسیله ساختارهای بالادستی شکل گرفتهاند و نه صرفاً انتخابهای فردی کنشگران هستند؛ بلکه در فرآیند پیچیده و پیوستهای از تعامل متقابل میان ساخت و عامل به وجود آمدهاند.
در این راستا در گام نظری با بهرهگیری از نظریه ساختیابی، مؤلفههای ساختیابی فضاهای سکونتی تبیین شده، در گام میدانی، الگوهای مسکونی منتخب شهر کرمانشاه تحلیل و تفسیر میگردد. در نهایت شرایط حاکم بر شکلگیری الگوهای چهارگانه فضاهای مسکونی در چارچوب مؤلفههای «منابع اقتداری»، «منابع تخصیصی»، «مفاهیم، هنجارها و ارزشهای اخلاقی» و «قواعد و الزامات قانونی» تبیین میشود.
Structuration of Kermanshah Houses
Architectural Pattern Since the 1980s
Moein Aghaeimehr*[1]
Minou Gharehbaglou**[2]
Mohammad Taghi Pirbabaei***[3]
Anthony Giddens’ structuration theory, with its emphasis on social action and rules and resources of Structuration, provides an effective framework for explaining the processes of production and reproduction of residential spaces. Drawing on this theoretical perspective, the present study analyzes the structuring components of contemporary residential architecture in the city of Kermanshah over recent decades. The main research question addresses how the prevailing conditions governing contemporary residential spaces in Kermanshah can be understood and how these conditions are interpreted through transformations in the structuring components of residential architecture.The study adopts a descriptive–analytical approach based on a post-hoc research strategy and employs case study, comparative analysis, and systematic qualitative content analysis. The findings indicate that transformations in Kermanshah’s residential architecture have resulted from a complex interaction between authoritative and allocative resources, legal regulations, and concepts and ethical values related to dwelling. Accordingly, the dominant residential patterns are classified into four typologies: early villas, later villas, early apartments, and later apartments. The results demonstrate that residential spaces in Kermanshah have been shaped neither solely by top-down structural forces nor merely by individual choices of social actors; rather, they have emerged through a continuous and dynamic process of reciprocal interaction between structure and agency. Ultimately, the governing conditions of the four residential typologies are explained within the framework of authoritative resources, allocative resources, concepts, norms and ethical values, and legal rules and regulations.
Keywords: Anthony Giddens, Structuration theory, Kermanshah, Residential Architecture, Housing studies.
Introduction
Residential architecture constitutes a critical interface between social structure and everyday life, reflecting broader demographic, cultural, and economic transformations. In this regard, cities undergoing rapid urbanization offer particularly fertile ground for examining the mutual constitution of space and society. Kermanshah, as one of the major urban centers in western Iran, has experienced significant population growth and structural change over the past several decades. The city’s population increased from approximately 290,000 inhabitants in 1976 to a projected figure exceeding 1,085,000 by 2025. This demographic expansion, accompanied by a decline in average household size—from 5.2 persons in 1976 to 3.3 persons in 2016—has generated an urgent demand for housing and placed increasing pressure on existing residential patterns.
Following the Iran–Iraq War, large-scale reconstruction efforts and shifts in family structure accelerated the transition from low-density, courtyard-based villa housing toward apartment living. Traditional single-family houses were gradually replaced by multi-story residential buildings, particularly in newly developing urban neighborhoods. While these changes enabled the city to accommodate population growth, they also introduced challenges, including the reduction of open and green spaces, increased residential density, and tensions between emerging architectural forms and long-standing cultural norms.
Against this background, the present study addresses the following central question: What conditions have governed the formation of residential spaces in Kermanshah since the 1980s, and how can these conditions be interpreted through transformations in the structural components of housing structure? Drawing on Giddens’ concept of structuration, which explains how social structures are produced and reproduced through human action, this research moves beyond purely descriptive analyses and seeks to uncover the social mechanisms shaping residential architecture.
Although a growing body of Iranian architectural literature emphasizes social and cultural dimensions of housing, much of this research remains limited to morphological description or symbolic interpretation. Few studies employ sociological frameworks capable of explaining how residential spaces are produced through the interaction of institutions, cultural values, and everyday practices. By applying structuration theory, this study addresses this gap and offers an integrated understanding of the structure–agency relationship in the residential architecture of Kermanshah. The research is positioned as fundamental–applied and contributes to both theoretical debate and housing policy discussions.
Theoretical Framework
Structuration theory, developed by Anthony Giddens, provides a framework for analyzing the reciprocal relationship between social structures and human agency. Social systems consist of practices recursively organized across time and space, while structures function simultaneously as the medium and the outcome of social action. Human agents draw upon rules and resources in their everyday practices, and through this process, structures are continuously reproduced or transformed.
In residential architecture, this perspective conceptualizes housing as a social system rather than merely a physical artifact. Giddens distinguishes between authoritative resources, referring to control over people and institutions, and allocative resources, which involve control over material and economic assets such as land, capital, and construction technologies.
Rules are divided into two dimensions: signification and legitimation. Signification refers to shared cultural meanings and interpretive schemes, including concepts such as privacy, hospitality, and symbolic architectural elements of traditional Iranian houses. Legitimation encompasses normative rules, laws, and regulations, including urban planning codes, building standards, and religious prescriptions. Together, these components provide an analytical lens for understanding how residential forms are produced, reproduced, and transformed through the interaction of power, culture, and regulation.
Methodology
This study adopts a retrospective research strategy and employs a qualitative methodological framework. A case-study approach was selected to enable in-depth analysis of residential transformations within a specific urban context. The research area comprises selected sections of the 22 Bahman neighborhood in Kermanshah, an area characterized by continuous residential development from the late Pahlavi period to the present. This temporal depth makes the neighborhood particularly suitable for examining changes in housing typologies and their underlying social conditions.
Data collection was conducted in two main stages. First, a comprehensive review of secondary sources—including population statistics, housing studies, and theoretical literature on structuration—was undertaken to establish the conceptual framework. Second, fieldwork was carried out using direct observation as the primary method for identifying physical and spatial characteristics of residential units. Semi-structured interviews with local residents and builders were used as a complementary tool to clarify and contextualize observational findings.
In total, 36 residential units were examined, including 20 villa houses and 16 apartment units, with eight samples used as pilot cases. The collected data were analyzed through systematic qualitative content analysis. Thematic coding was conducted within the framework of structuration theory, focusing on the interaction between agency, resources, and rules. To enhance the validity of the analysis, data triangulation was employed by cross-referencing observations, interview data, and documentary sources.
Findings
The analysis identified four dominant residential architectural typologies in the study area: early villas (from the 1950s to the late 1980s), late villas (from the early 1990s to the early 2000s), early apartments (from the late 1990s to the mid-2000s), and late apartments (from the mid-2000s to the present).
Early villa housing typically consisted of one- or two-story buildings, with or without basements, organized around a central family living space that functioned as the main distributive node. Kitchens were enclosed and spatially separated from reception areas, and strong distinctions were maintained between private and semi-public spaces. In later villa models, spatial configurations gradually shifted toward greater openness: internal partitions were reduced, corridors connecting the courtyard were removed, kitchens became open-plan, and parking spaces were incorporated into the residential interior. These changes reflected both evolving cultural preferences and emerging regulatory and economic pressures.
The transition to apartment housing was closely linked to urban development incentives and regulatory changes aimed at increasing construction density. Early apartment buildings were typically low-rise, lacked elevators, and allowed shared or open parking arrangements. Interior layouts emphasized integrated living and reception spaces and open-plan kitchens. With the gradual enforcement of stricter building regulations—particularly mandatory private parking and safety requirements—unit sizes increased, while open and green spaces within residential plots declined. In late apartment typologies, elevators, fire-resistant doors, and enhanced structural and mechanical systems became mandatory features, reflecting the growing influence of institutional authority and technical standards.
Across all four typologies, residential forms were shaped by shifting configurations of authoritative resources, allocative resources, cultural meanings, and legal regulations. These configurations varied over time, producing distinct spatial outcomes and patterns of domestic life.
Discussion and Conclusion
The findings demonstrate that the formation of residential architecture in Kermanshah cannot be adequately explained by reference to physical constraints or market forces alone. Instead, housing transformations emerge from a complex and continuous interaction between human agency and structural components. In the early villa period, authoritative resources were largely concentrated in individual property owners, who shaped housing forms in accordance with prevailing cultural values. Over time, authority increasingly shifted toward construction companies, municipal institutions, and professional regulatory bodies, fundamentally altering the conditions of housing Structuration.
Allocative resources also underwent significant transformation. Land and capital gradually became embedded within speculative housing markets, driven by population growth, rising land values, and advances in construction technology. These changes facilitated high-density apartment construction while simultaneously constraining traditional spatial practices. Cultural signification rules evolved in parallel: values such as privacy, family security, and hospitality—central to early villa housing—were progressively reconfigured in response to urban migration, reduced household size, increased female employment, consumerism, and the adoption of modern technologies and lifestyles.
Legitimation rules, including religious norms and building regulations, likewise changed in response to shifting governmental policies and urban planning frameworks. Contemporary regulations place increasing emphasis on energy efficiency, lighting and ventilation, structural safety, neighborhood relations, automobile accommodation, and legal definitions of ownership and privacy—dimensions that have profoundly reshaped residential space.
From the perspective of structuration theory, residential spaces in Kermanshah are neither the direct outcome of top-down structural forces nor the result of individual choice alone. Rather, they are produced through an ongoing process of mutual constitution between structure and agency. This study contributes theoretically by demonstrating the analytical value of structuration theory in housing and architectural research and by reinforcing the necessity of a dual structure–agency perspective. Practically, the findings offer insights for architects and housing planners by highlighting the importance of aligning design strategies with local power structures and cultural values. The structuration-based framework developed in this research can be applied to other Iranian cities and may support the formulation of socially and culturally grounded housing policies.
Refrence
Aghaeimehr, M., & Gharehbaglou, M. (2020). Identity-Based Contemporization; Case Study: Iran Contemporary Urban Districts in Pahlavi Era. Journal of Naqshejahan- Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning, 10(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1001.1.23224991.1399.10.1.5.1
Aghaeimehr, M., Gharehbaglou, M., & Pirbabaei, M. T. (2023). Structuration of Residential Spaces Architecture with Iranian-Islamic Culture Approach. Journal of Culture of Islamic Architecture and Urbanism, 8(1), 20–42. https://doi.org/10.52547/ciauj.7.1.298
Aghaeimehr, M., Gharehbaglou, M., & Pirbabaei, M. T. (2024). Durability and Dynamism of Cultural Identity in Recent Residential Complexes (Case Study: Kermanshah Residential Complexes from 1980). Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture and Urban Planning, 29(2), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2025.378222.672987
Radaei, M., Gharehbaglou, M., Key nejhad, M. A., Ahmadnejad, F., & Beyti, H. (2024). The Values of the Muslim Human and their Expression in the Architecture of the Iranian Islamic House (Case Study: Historical Houses in City of Yazd). Journal of Iranian-Islamic City, 14(51). https://iic.ihss.ac.ir/Article/42332
Rashidzadeh, E., & Habibi, F. (2020). Cultural Analysis of Space in In Kurdish Residential Architecture; Case Study: Traditional Houses in Mukrian (The City of Sardasht). Journal of Iranian-Islamic City, 11(40), 17–31. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2228639.1399.10.40.2.6
Kalantari Khalilabad, H., Nezamdoost, S. A. R., & Yaran, A. (2020). Elucidation of the physical patterns of contemporary housing based on the contextual architecture in Kashan; Case study: Selected historical houses of the Qajar dynasty. Journal of Iranian-Islamic City, 10(38), 5–20. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2228639.1398.10.38.1.7
Anacker, K. B. (2019). 'Introduction: Housing affordability and affordable housing'. International Journal of Housing Policy, 19(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2018.1560544
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998) “What is agency?” American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. DOI: 10.1086/231294
Giddens, Anthony (1997) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity. https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520057289/the-constitution-of-society
Giddens, A. (1998). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Cambridge, UK: Polity press. https://politybooks.com/bookdetail/?isbn=9780745622674
Giddens, A. (2013) New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. 2nd edition. London: Polity press. https://www.sup.org/books/sociology/new-rules-sociological-method
Guerrero, O. (2020). 'Decentralized markets and the emergence of housing wealth inequality'. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 84, 101541. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101541
Guerrero, O. A., & Law, S. (2024). 'The spatial structure of housing affordability and the impact of public infrastructure'. Journal of Simulation, 18(6), 973–987. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477778.2024.2325428
Karimi, K. (2023) 'The Configurational Structures of Social Spaces: Space Syntax and Urban Morphology in the Context of Analytical, Evidence-Based Design.' Journal of Land. 12 (11), 2084. 1-23. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/land12112084
Segre, M. S. (2014) Contemporary Sociological Thinkers and Theories. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315573946
* Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, National University of Skills, Tehran, Iran.
Disa.ag@gmail.com
0000-0002-1415-9608
** Corresponding Author: Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran.
m.gharehbaglou@tabriziau.ac.ir
0000-0003-2639-2906
*** Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran.
0000-0002-6305-9611
قرآن کریم.
آقاییمهر، معین (1400) تبیین پایایی و پویایی هویت فرهنگی در فضاهای سکونتی (موردپژوهی: مجموعههای مسکونی منتخب شهر کرمانشاه)، رساله دکترای معماری اسلامی، به راهنمایی دکتر مینو قرهبگلو و دکتر محمدتقی پیربابایی، تبریز، دانشگاه هنر اسلامی تبریز.
آقاییمهر، معین و مینو قرهبگلو (1399) «معاصرسازی هویت - مبنا؛ نمونه موردی: بافتهای شهری معاصر ایران در دوره پهلوی»، نشریه علمی پژوهشی نقشجهان، 10(1)، صص 11-18.
.
DOI:10.1001.1.23224991.1399.10.1.5.1 آقاییمهر، معین و مینو قرهبگلو و محمدتقی پیربابایی (1402) «ساختیابی معماری فضاهای سکونتی با رویکرد فرهنگ ایرانی - اسلامی»، نشریه علمی پژوهشی فرهنگ معماری و شهرسازی اسلامی، سال هشتم، شماره ۱، صص ۲۰-۴۲.
.
DOI:10.52547/ciauj.7.1.298 آقاییمهر، معین و مینو قرهبگلو و محمدتقی پیربابایی (1403) «پایایی و پویایی هویت فرهنگی در فضاهای سکونتی معاصر (موردپژوهی: فضاهای سکونتی کرمانشاه از سال 1360 تاکنون)»، نشریه هنرهای زیبا: معماری و شهرسازی، سال بیست¬ونهم، شماره 2، صص 7-22.
doi: 10.22059/jfaup.2025.378222.672987.
اسکندری دورباطی، زهرا و مهرداد جواهریپور و فرح ترکمان (۱۴۰۱) «مالکیت زمین و ساختیابی سکونت¬گاههای غیر رسمی در ایران (1357-۱۳۹۹)»، نشریه علمی پژوهشی توسعه محلی (روستایی - شهری)، سال چهاردهم، شماره ۱، صص ۳۰۵-۳۳۱.
https://doi.org/10.22059/jrd.2022.345452.668743.
اشعثکوفی، محمدبن محمد (بیتا) الجعفریات، تهران، مکتبة نینوی الحدیثة.
الرضا، علیبن موسی(ع) (1381) طبالرضا، ترجمه نصیرالدین امیر صادقی، تهران، معراجی.
برقی، احمد بن محمد بن خالد (1371ه.ق) المحاسن، جلد 2، قم، دارالکتب الإسلامیة.
پاینده، ابوالقاسم (1382) نهجالفصاحة، تهران، دنیای دانش.
پیربابایی، محمدتقی و رحیم ایرانشاهی (1399) «واکاوی نقش فرهنگ وقف در تکوین ارسنهای شهری بر اساس نظریه ساختیابی»، نشریه فرهنگ معماری و شهرسازی اسلامی، سال پنجم، شماره 2، صص 36-17.
.
DOI: 10.29252/ciauj.5.2.17 حرّانی، حسنبن علیبن حسینابن شعبه (1363) تحفالعقول، ترجمه محمدصادق حسنزاده، قم، چاپ علیاکبر غفاری. ردایی، مهشید و مینو قرهبگلو و محمدعلی کینژاد و فرهاد احمدنژاد و حامد بیتی (1402) «ارزشهای انسان مسلمان و نمود آن در معماری خانه ایرانی اسلامی (نمونه موردی: خانههای تاریخی شهر یزد)»، نشریه مطالعات شهر ایرانی اسلامی، سال پنجاه¬ویکم، شماره 14، صص 1-28.
https://iic.ihss.ac.ir/Article/42332.
رشیدزاده، الهام و فواد حبیبی (1399) «تحلیل روابط فرهنگی در پیکرهبندی فضایی مسکن سنتی کردها (مطالعه موردی: خانههای سنتی شهری منطقه موکریان (شهر سردشت)»، مطالعات شهر ایرانی اسلامی، سال چهاردهم، شماره 40، صص 17-31.
https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2228639.1399.10.40.2.6.
سجادزاده، حسن و بهاره اریس (۱۳۹۶) «بررسی تولید معنا در فضای شهری بر مبنای نظریه ساختیابی (مطالعه موردی: بازار تبریز)»، فصلنامه پژوهشهای جغرافیای انسانی، سال چهل¬ونهم، شماره ۲، صص ۲۷۳-۲۸۷.
.
https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2017.55475 شالچی، سمیه و میترا عظیمی (۱۳۹۸) «مطالعۀ «زنانه - شدن» فقر در ایران ۱۳۶5-۱۳۹۵»، پژوهشنامه زنان، سال دهم، شماره 2، صص 113-142.
.
https://doi.org/10.30465/ws.2019.4363 شیخصدوق، محمدبن علی بن بابویه قمی (1413ه.ق) من لایحضره الفقیه، جلد 3، قم، دفتر انتشارات اسلامی.
--------------------- (1362) الخصال، جلد 2، تصحیح علی¬اکبر غفاری، قم، جامعه مدرسین.
صالحینیا، مجید و حسن رجبعلی (1403) «ترادیسی معماری خانههای تاریخی شهر گرگان از دوره قاجاریه به پهلوی اول»، نشریه مطالعات شهر ایرانی اسلامی، سال پنجاه¬وششم، شماره 15، صص 21-45.
.
https://iic.ihss.ac.ir/Article/48447 عباسی آذر، سودابه و سیامک پناهی و حسین کلانتری خلیلآباد (1402) «تبیین مؤلفههای تأثیرگذار در شکلگیری ساختار «وید» مؤثر بر تعاملات اجتماعی (بناهای مسکونی دوره پهلوی دوم تا به امروز شهر تهران)»، فصلنامه مطالعات شهر ایرانی - اسلامی، سال پنجاه¬وچهارم، شماره 14، صص 1-17.
.
https://iic.ihss.ac.ir/Article/4726 فیضکاشانی، محمدمحسن (1406ه.قـ) الوافی، (جلد 23، اصفهان، كتابخانه امام أميرالمؤمنين علی(ع).
قربانی، رحیم (1393) معماری و شهرسازی مطلوب اسلامی: درآمدی بر فقه کاربردی و تمدنی، مسکن مطلوب اسلامی، تهران، شبکه اندیشه.
قرهبگلو، مینو و دیگران (1396) «شناسایی و تحلیل مؤلفههای تأثیرگذار بر محیط پاسخده در محلات از منظر جهانبینی اسلامی»، نشریه علمی پژوهشی نقش جهان، سال هفتم، شماره 1، صص 21-36.
.
http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1396.7.1.6.1 کاظمی، سید محمد و حسین مهدویپور و سیدعلیاکبر کوششگران (1401) «خوانش مؤلفههای حیات بخش از بازخوانی حیاط خانههای سنتی یزد»، نشریه علمی پژوهشی مطالعات شهر ایرانی اسلامی، سال سیزدهم، شماره 48، صص 1-13.
https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2228639.1401.12.48.3.7.
کلانتری خلیلآباد، حسین و سیدامیررضا نظامدوست و علی یاران (1398) «تبیین الگوی کالبدی مسکن معاصر مبتنی بر معماری زمینهگرا (مطالعه موردی: خانههای تاریخی منتخب دوره قاجار)»، فصلنامه مطالعات شهر ایرانی اسلامی، سال سی¬وهشتم، شماره 10، صص 5-20.
https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2228639.1398.10.38.1.7.
کلینی، محمدبن یعقوب (1407ه.ق) الکافی، جلد 3، 5، 13، تصحیح علی¬اکبر غفاری، تهران، دارالکتب الاسلامیه.
گیدنز، آنتونی (1380) جامعهشناسي، ترجمه منوچهر صبوري، تهران، نشرني.
.
ISBN:978-964-312-168-6 مجلسی، محمدباقر (1410 ه.ق) بحارالأنوار الجامعة لدرر أخبار الأئمة الأطهار، جلد 23، 59، 72، 73، 77، 100، 103، بیروت، مؤسسه الوفاء. مرکز آمار ایران (1395) نتایج سرشماری عمومی نفوس و مسکن، قابل دسترسی در: https://amar.org.ir/.
مکارم شیرازی، ناصر (1382) تفسیر نمونه، جلد 11، تهران، دارالکتب الاسلامیه.
Anacker, K. B. (2019) 'Introduction: Housing affordability and affordable housing'. International Journal of Housing Policy, 19(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2018.1560544.
Binder, C. R. (2007) From material flow analysis to material flow management, Part II: The role of structural agent analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(17), 1605-1617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.02.016.
Blaikie, Norman. W. H. (2007) Approaches to Social Enquiry: Advancing Knowledge, London: Polity press.
https://books.google.com/books?id=QiBZOAAACAAJ.
Bryant, C. G. A., and Jary, D. (1991) Introduction: coming to terms with Anthony Giddens. Giddens’ Theory of Structuration: A Critical Appreciation. London: Routledge press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26616-6_22.
Cassell, Philip (2004) Abstract of Anthony Giddens's works. Translated by Hassan Chavoshian. 2004. Tehran: Phoenix Publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22890-4.
Cataldi Giancarlo & Luigi MaffeiGian & Vaccaro Paolo (2002) 'SaverioMuratori and the Italian school of planning typology'. Urban morphology (the Journal of the International Seminar on Urban Form). 6(2).
DOI:10.51347/jum.v6i1.3899.
DeRose, L., Goldscheider, F., Reyes Brito, J., & Gas-Aixendri, M. (2019) Are children barriers to the gender revolution? International comparisons. European Journal of Population, 35(2), 219–242.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-018-9483-z.
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998) “What is agency?” American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.
DOI: 10.1086/231294.
Furstenberg, F. F. (2013) Transitions to adulthood: What we can learn from the West. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 646(1), 28–41.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212471048.
Gan, Q., & Hill, R. J. (2009) 'Measuring housing affordability: Looking beyond the median'. Journal of Housing Economics, 18(2), 115–125.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe. 2009.04.003.
Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Polity Press / University of California Press. ISBN: 9780745600062.
------------- (1997) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity.
https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520057289/the-constitution-of-society.
------------- (1998) The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Cambridge, UK: Polity press.
https://politybooks.com/bookdetail/?isbn=9780745622674.
------------ (2013) New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. 2nd edition. London: Polity press. https://www.sup.org/books/sociology/new-rules-sociological-method.
Goode, W. J. (1963) World revolution and family patterns. New York, NY: Free Press of Glencoe.
Guerrero, O. (2020) 'Decentralized markets and the emergence of housing wealth inequality'. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 84, 101541.
https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101541.
Guerrero, O. A., & Law, S. (2024) 'The spatial structure of housing affordability and the impact of public infrastructure'. Journal of Simulation, 18(6), 973–987.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17477778.2024.2325428.
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (2009) The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597237.
Karimi, K. (2023) 'The Configurational Structures of Social Spaces: Space Syntax and Urban Morphology in the Context of Analytical, Evidence-Based Design.' Journal of Land. 12 (11), 2084. 1-23.
https://doi.org/ 10.3390/land12112084.
Lechet, John (2008) Fifty Great Contemporary Thinkers: From Structuralism to Post-Humanism, London: Routledge press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203390573.
Segre, M. S. (2014) Contemporary Sociological Thinkers and Theories. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315573946.
Sewell Jr, W. H. (1992) ‘A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation’, American Journal of Sociology, 1–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/229967.
URL01: https://iranstatis.com.
URL02: https://www.irna.ir.
URL03: https://earth.google.com.
Whittington, Richard (2015) Giddens, structuration theory and strategy as practice. Edited by: Golsorkhi, Damon, Rouleau, Linda, Seidl, David and Vaara, Eero, (eds.) Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-strategy-as-practice/01E7B7E45F09B69F54C6E6A118F9E1D8.