تبیین عوامل مؤثر بر زیست‌پذیری اجتماعی بافت¬های فرسوده در شهرهای ایرانی- اسلامی (مورد پژوهی: منطقه 12 تهران)
محورهای موضوعی : شهرسازی اسلامی
سینا غیورانه
1
*
,
حسین کلانتری خلیل آباد
2
,
صبا جهانگیر
3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری، گروه شهرسازی، واحد آیت الله آملی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مازندران، ایران
2 - استاد گروه شهرسازی، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات اجتماعی، جهاددانشگاهی، تهران، ایران
3 - استادیار گروه شهرسازی، واحد آیت الله آملی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مازندران، ایران
کلید واژه: زیست‌پذیری, زیست‌پذیری اجتماعی, تعلق مکانی, بافت فرسوده, منطقه 12 تهران,
چکیده مقاله :
امروزه، شهرها مکان اصلی کار و زندگی بخش عمدۀ بشر شده‌اند، به‌طوری که بیش از 50% از جمعیت 7 میلیارد نفری جهان در شهرها زندگی می‌کنند. از این رو، توجه به کیفیت زندگی، شرایط، امکانات و نیازهای ساکنان شهرها، مسئله‌ای حیاتی است. نظر به مشکلات متعدد شهرها، رویکردهای مختلفی برای ارتقاء و بهبود شرایط زندگی در آنها پیشنهاد و مطرح شده است که زیست‌پذیری شهری یکی از آنها است. امروزه زیست‌پذیری در بیشتر کشورهای توسعه‌یافته به‌عنوان یک اصل راهنما در چارچوب گفت‌مان پایداری در سیاست‌گذاری‌ها و برنامه‌ریزی شهری گسترش پیدا کرده است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف تبیین عوامل مؤثر بر زیست‌پذیری اجتماعی بافت‌های فرسوده در شهرهای ایرانی- اسلامی تدوین شد. مطالعه حاضر ازنظر هدف، کاربردی و ازنظر روش توصيفی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش را ساکنان منطقه 12 شهر تهران تشکیل میداد، حجم نمونه با استفاده از فرمول کوکران 373 نفر برآورد گردید. روایی ابزار تحقیق با استفاده از مدل تحلیل عاملی تأییدی و پایایی آن با استفاده از آلفای کرونباخ محاسبه شده است. تجزیه وتحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزارهای SPSSو SMART PLS با روش آمار توصیفی و مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری انجام شد. یافتهها نشان داد که مشارکت، امنیت اجتماعی، همبستگی و تعاملات اجتماعی و تعلق مکانی بر زیست‌پذیری اجتماعی تأثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد. از بین متغیرهایی مورد بررسی متغیر تعلق مکانی با ضریب مسیر 258/0 دارای بیشترین تأثیر بر زیست‌پذیری اجتماعی بود.
Explaining the Factors Affecting the Social Livability
of Dilapidated Urban Areas in Islamic Iranian Cities
(Case Study: District 12, Tehran)
Sina Ghayuraneh*
Hossein Kalantari Khalilabad **
Saba Jahangir***
Today, cities have become the main place of working and living for most of the people, so that more than 50% of the world's 7 billion people live in cities. Therefore, paying attention to the quality of life, conditions, facilities, and needs of city residents is a vital issue. Given the numerous problems of cities, various approaches have been proposed and put forward to promote and improve living conditions, of which urban livability is one of them. Today, livability has spread in most developed countries as a guiding principle within the framework of the sustainability discourse in urban policymaking and planning. The present study was developed with the aim of explaining the factors affecting the social livability of dilapidated urban areas in Islamic Iranian cities. This study is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive in terms of method. The statistical population of the study consisted of residents of District 12 of Tehran, and the sample size was estimated to be 373 people using the Cochran formula. The validity of the research tool was calculated using the confirmatory factor analysis model and its reliability was calculated using Cronbach's alpha. Data analysis was performed using SPSS and SMART PLS software with descriptive statistics and structural equation modeling. The findings showed that participation, social security, solidarity, and social interactions, and spatial belonging have a positive and significant effect on social livability. Among the variables studied, the spatial belonging variable with a path coefficient of 0.258 had the greatest effect on social livability.
Keywords: livability, social livability, spatial belonging, dilapidated texture, District 12 of Tehran.
Introduction
According to the World Cities Report published by the United Nations in 2020, urbanization will continue to be a driver of global growth and a basis for poverty, unemployment, inequality, climate change and other global challenges we face (Xiao et al., 2022: 145) Unplanned and improper management and the emergence of socio-economic and environmental problems in today's cities have led to a decrease in living standards and, consequently, a decrease in the sustainability and livability of cities, which has placed attention to livability indicators as the key to solving many urban issues and problems at the forefront of planning (Karbasi and Kargar,1402: 19) In general, today, the lack of attention to human and social needs in urban planning and management creates significant obstacles to improving the quality of life and satisfaction of residents (Hekmat-Niya et al., 1400: 32). In this regard, the concept of livability as a new approach to improving the quality of life has been on the agenda of urban planners and managers. This concept has played an important role in urban planning and development, however, this concept is fluid and has been used in various situations (Kashef, 2023: 242).
District 12 of Tehran is no exception to this rule, as this area has begun its downward trend since the mid-20th century. The decrease in population in the neighborhoods of the city's initial cores and the movement of the population towards the outer layers are among the most important challenges it has faced. As the population of this region has decreased from 343,633 people in 1979 to 241,831 people in 2016, which shows a negative growth rate of -14.1 percent (Statistical Center of Iran, 2016). The problems mentioned on the one hand and the tendency to develop and invest in the suburbs and outer layers of the city for various reasons, including cheap land and housing prices, ecological attractions such as clean and healthy air, etc., on the other hand, have caused a decline in the quality of life, a decrease in vitality, a decrease in livability and a decrease in the prosperity of social life, and physical and functional deterioration in this region (Zare et al., 1400: 800). The aforementioned conditions are the product of macro factors, forces and processes outside the boundaries of Region 12 and its neighborhoods and even outside Tehran, such as general urban management policies, the national role of commercial areas and axes (Salehi et al., 1401: 86). Considering the above issues, the initial research question is “What factors affect social livability in the worn-out fabric of District 12 of Tehran?”
Research Method
This study is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive in terms of method. Documentary and field methods were used to collect data. The statistical population of the study consisted of citizens living in District 12 of Tehran, whose number is 241,831 people. The sample size was estimated to be 373 people using the Cochran formula. The sampling method was simple random sampling. A questionnaire was used to collect field data. The reliability of the questionnaire was measured by calculating Cronbach's alpha and calculating the composite reliability coefficient (cr). The value of Cronbach's alpha and the composite reliability coefficient for each variable are between zero and one, and if the value obtained is higher than 0.7, the questionnaire has appropriate reliability. The results of the value of Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability of the questionnaire confirm the appropriate reliability of the questionnaire used. In this study, structural equation modeling in the PLS software environment was used to analyze the data.
Research findings
Regarding the effect of participation on social livability, the results indicate that the value of the T-statistic obtained is equal to 2.134, so that this value is greater than 1.96. Also, the path coefficient obtained is equal to (β=0.158), since the path coefficient obtained is positive, this effect is direct.
Regarding the effect of social security on social livability, the results indicate that the value of the T-statistic obtained is equal to 2.607, so that this value is greater than 1.96. Also, the path coefficient obtained is equal to (β=0.207), since the path coefficient obtained is positive, this effect is direct. So it can be said that social security has a positive and significant effect on social livability.
Regarding the effect of solidarity and social interactions on social livability, the results indicate that the value of the T-statistic obtained is equal to 2.604, so that this value is greater than 1.96. Also, the path coefficient obtained is equal to (β=0.216), since the path coefficient obtained is positive, this effect is direct. So it can be said that solidarity and social interactions have a positive and significant effect on social livability. Regarding the effect of place attachment on social livability, the results indicate that the value of the T-statistic obtained is equal to 4.602, so that this value is greater than 1.96. Also, the path coefficient obtained is equal to (β=0.258), since the path coefficient obtained is positive, this effect is direct. So it can be stated that place attachment has a positive and significant effect on social livability.
Conclusion
The findings of this study showed that in relation to the impact of participation on social livability, the results confirmed that the path coefficient obtained was equal to (β=0.158), considering the path coefficient obtained, the impact coefficient is evaluated as moderate. In explaining the results of this section, it can be stated that the issue of people's and citizens' participation in the economic and social development of cities has been considered in urban development studies and planning for several decades.
Regarding the effect of social security on social livability, the results indicated that the effect of social security on the promotion of social livability was confirmed. The path coefficient obtained was 0.207, and according to the path coefficient obtained, this effect is assessed as moderate. In explaining the results of this section, it can be stated that if worn-out structures gradually deteriorate on a large scale, they will become unsafe and crime-prone areas. If these areas are not addressed properly, due to poor design and even undesirable lighting, it will create problems for residents that may ultimately lead to leaving the structure. Therefore, in order to increase livability in terms of security, it is possible to widen the passages and construct appropriate lighting for them.
Regarding the effect of solidarity and social interactions on social livability, the results indicate that solidarity and social interactions have a positive and significant effect on social livability, considering the value of the path coefficient, which is equal to 0.216, this effect is assessed as moderate. Regarding the effect of place belonging on social livability, the results indicate confirmation of the hypothesis, and considering the value of the path coefficient obtained, this effect is assessed as moderate. A sense of belonging to a place is a higher level of a sense of place that leads to high-quality environments and humans consider themselves part of it and respect it. Place belonging means that people define themselves with the help of the place where they were born and grew up. This connection affects people in a deep and lasting way, and the memory of place strengthens human identity and power.
Reference
Kashef, M. (2023) Urban livability across disciplinary and professional boundaries. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 5(2), 239–253. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2016.03.003
Zhu, Y., & Du, R. (2024) Evaluating the impact of urban landscape elements on the sense of security and local belonging-case study: Tongdejie, China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1340394. https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2024(02)00232-3
Aulia, D. N., & Marpaung, B. O. (2025) Assessment of Livability factors as an Adaptation of Settled Behavior to Improve Sustainable Housing. Future Cities and Environment, 11. https: //cspub-fce-submission.org/index.php/fce/article/view/54
Long, Y., Wu, Y., Huang, L., Aleksejeva, J., Iossifova, D., Dong, N., & Gasparatos, A. (2024) Assessing urban livability in Shanghai through an open source data-driven approach. npj Urban Sustainability, 4(1), 7. https: //www.nature.com/articles/s42949-024-00146-z
Daviran, E. (2024) The Functional Effect of Public Spaces in the Stability of the Sense of Place Belonging the Case Study: Public Spaces in the Central Texture of Zanjan City. Sustainable city, 7(1), 97-115. https: //doi.org/10.22034/jsc.2024.432435.1756
Jodder, P. K., Hossain, M. Z., & Thill, J. C. (2025) Urban Livability in a Rapidly Urbanizing Mid-Size City: Lessons for Planning in the Global South. Sustainability, 17(4), 1504. https: //doi.org/10.3390/su17041504
Zhan, D., Kwan, M. P., Zhang, W., Fan, J., Yu, J., & Dang, Y. (2018) Assessment and determinants of satisfaction with urban livability in China. Cities, 79, 92-101. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.025
* Corresponding Author: Ph.D Student, Urban Planning Department, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mazandaran, Iran.
S.gh1375@yahoo.com
** Professor of the Department of Urban and Regional Planning and Management, Insitute for Humanities and Social Studies in ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
H_kalantari2005@yahoo.com
*** Assistant Professor, Urban Planning Department, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mazandaran, Iran.
saba.jahangir@yahoo.com
آسیابانی پور، الهام و علی پناهی و حسن احمد زاده (1400) سنجش و ارزیابی بعد عینی زیست‌پذیری شهری در مناطق دهگانۀ کلانشهر تبریز. پژوهشهای جغرافیای انسانی. 53 (2)، صص 545-565.
https: //doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2020.286057.1007981.
احمدی، مصطفی و صدرالدین متولی و غلامرضا جانباز قبادی و سارا غلامی (1403) شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر زیست‌پذیری بافت‌های فرسوده (محدوده مورد مطالعه: بافت فرسوده منطقه 1 شهر ساری)، نشریه جغرافیا، 11 (42)، صص 930-945.
https: //doi.org/10.22034/jgeoq.2023.213674.2265.
اکبری، نعمت اله و رومینا مویدفر و فرزانه میرزایی (1396) تحليل زيست‌پذيري در بافت فرسوده شهر اصفهان با تاکيد بر استراتژي توسعه شهري. فصلنامه اقتصاد و مدیریت شهری، 6 (1)، صص 33-50.
https: //dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23452870.1396.6.21.3.0.
بیرانوند، مسلم و حیدر جهانبخش (1401) افزایش زیست‌پذیری بافت‌های فرسوده شهری از طریق اعمال برنامه های راهبردی مداخله گر بوم‌گرا، پژوهش موردی: شهر خرم آباد، نشریه پژوهش¬های بوم شناسی، 13 (3)، صص 1-22.
https: //doi.org/10.30473/grup.2021.46793.2371.
پیری، فاطمه و سعید ملکی و زهرا عابدی (1400) شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر زیست‌پذیری شهری با رویکرد مدل‌سازی ساختاری- تفسیریISM (نمونه موردی: شهر ایلام).. جغرافیا و توسعه ناحیه ای، 19 (1)، صص 53-87.
https: //doi.org/10.22067/jgrd.2021.48827.0.
پوراحمد، احمد و یعقوب ابدالی و سارا الله قلی پور (1399) تحلیل فضایی آثار حکمروایی مطلوب بر زیست‌پذیری شهری؛ مطالعة موردی: کانون‌های جرم‌خیز مناطق 11 و 12 شهر تهران. برنامه ریزی فضایی، 10 (2)، صص 83-104.
https: //dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22287485.1399.10.2.5.3.
حسنی میانرودی، نسیم (1402) رویکرد ادراک حسی محیط و میزان اثر گذاری آن در ایجاد حس تعلق، حس مکان و دل‌بستگی مکانی، کنفرانس ملی شهرسازی و معماری دانش بنیان. https: //sid.ir/paper/1082904/fa حکمت نیا، حسن و میرنجف موسوی و نوبخت سبحانی، و سینا سلمان زاده (1400) تأثیر آسیب های اجتماعی بر زیست‌پذیری در فضاهای شهری (مطالعه موردی: شاهین دژ). پژوهش های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 9 (1 )، صص 29-50.
https: //doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2021.301572.1273.
حیدری، محمدتقی (1397). واکاوی تیپولوژیک رویکرد زیست‌پذیری در بافت‌های فرسوده شهری (مطالعة موردی: بافت فرسودة بخش مرکزی شهر زنجان).، مجله جغرافیای اجتماعی شهری، 5 (1)، صص 10- 25.
https: //dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.26457784.1397.5.1.6.8.
حسین¬زاده، رباب؛ صفرعلی¬زاده، اسماعیل؛ خبازی، حسین. (1400). سنجش زیست‌پذیری محلات شهری در راستای توسعه پایدار از دیدگاه شهروندان، موردمطالعه: محله شهر کهنه و شهرک سیدمرتضی-کاشمر. فصلنامه جغرافیا و مطالعات محیطی، 40 (10)، صص 120-133.
https: //dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20087845.1400.10.40.8.6.
خزاعی نژاد، فروغ، سلیمانی مهرنجانی، محمد، و زنگانه، احمد. (1397). ارزیابی زیست‌پذیری محله های منطقه 12 شهر تهران. جغرافیا و توسعه فضای شهری، 5 (1 (پیاپی 8) )، صص 45-70.
https: //dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.25383531.1397.5.1.3.6.
زارع، الهام و آرش ثقفی اصل و مهسا فریدی ثانی (1400) تحلیل زیست‌پذیری در بخش مرکزی شهر تهران (مورد مطالعه: منطقه 12). مطالعات برنامه ریزی سکونت‌گاه‌های انسانی (چشم انداز جغرافیایی)، 16 (4)، صص 799-821.
https: //journals.iau.ir/article_676990.html.
زیاری، کرامت اله و احمد حاتمی و ابولحسن صفرپور (1400) ارزیابی ابعاد و مولفه های زیست‌پذیری در نواحی شهری با رویکرد توسعه پایدار ( نمونه موردی نواحی شهر خرم آباد. فصلنامه چشم انداز شهرهای آینده. ۲ (۲)، صص 33-50.
http: //jvfc.ir/article-1-100-fa.html.
زیاری، کرامت اله؛ حاتمی، احمد؛ مصباحی، سحر؛ عاشوری، حسن. (1398). ارزیابی و تحلیل ابعاد و مولفه¬های زیست‌پذیری شهرهای کوچک در راستای توسعه پایدار نمونه موردی: بندر دیلم. فصلنامه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی منطقه ای، 9 (4)، صص 569-586.
https: //dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22286462.1398.9.4.7.7.
زین العابدین زاده، سمیه و بختیار عزت پناه وکریم حسین زاده دلیر (1402) ارزیابی مؤلفه‌های مؤثر بر حس تعلق مکانی با رویکرد شهر شاد مطالعه موردی: کلانشهر ارومیه. مجله شهر پایدار, 6 (2)، صص 21-37.
https: //doi.org/10.22034/jsc.2023.375310.1672.
صالحی معوا، فاطمه و سیدمهدی خاتمی و احسان رنجبر (1401) تحلیل و مقایسه میزان رویدادمداری فضاهای عمومی شهری مورد مطالعه: منطقه 12 شهر تهران. باغ نظر، 19 (106 )، صص 85-98.
https: //doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2021.269717.4780.
کرباسی، امین و بهمن کارگر (1402) تبیین ابعاد اجتماعی زیست‌پذیری در سکونت‌گاه‌های غیررسمی (مطالعه موردی: محله کشتارگاه). نشریه جغرافیا و آینده پژوهی منطقه‌ای، 1 (2)، صص 17-32.
https: //doi.org/10.30466/grfs.2023.54897.1019.
مرادپور، نبی، و کرامت اله زیاری (1401) تحلیل فضایی-زمانی جرایم سرقت در منطقه 12 شهر تهران. تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی (علوم جغرافیایی)، 22 (65 )، صص 103-117.
http: //dx.doi.org/10.52547/jgs.22.65.103.
نوروزی، نسترن و علیرضا شیخ الاسلامی . محمد جلیلی (1402) زیست‌پذیری در شهر و پیراشهر مسجد سلیمان، نشریه توسعه فضاهای پیراشهری، 5 (1)، صص 203-216.
https: //doi.org/10.22034/jpusd.2023.354132.1224.
Altrock, U. (2022). Urban livability in socially disadvantaged neighborhoods: The experience of the German program “socially integrative city”. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11 (5), 783-794. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.12.006.
Aulia, D. N., & Marpaung, B. O. (2025). Assessment of Livability factors as an Adaptation of Settled Behavior to Improve Sustainable Housing. Future Cities and Environment, 11. https: //cspub-fce-submission.org/index.php/fce/article/view/54.
Badland, H., Villanueva, K., Alderton, A., Davern, M., & Goldfeld, S. (2019). An urban neighbourhood framework for realising progress towards the New Urban Agenda for equitable early childhood development. Children's geographies, 21 (6), 1087-1105. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102502.#3 Daviran, E. (2024). The Functional Effect of Public Spaces in the Stability of the Sense of Place Belonging the Case Study: Public Spaces in the Central Texture of Zanjan City. Sustainable city, 7 (1), 97-115. https: //doi.org/10.22034/jsc.2024.432435.1756.#3 Fu, X., Adejoke, A. B., Salaripour, A., Zali, N., & Reihani, Z. S. (2024). Does Urban Livability Lead to Place Attachment and Behavioural Intentions? Case Study: Isfahan City. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 15 (1), 156-174. https: //doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2024.276471.1063.
Jodder, P. K., Hossain, M. Z., & Thill, J. C. (2025). Urban Livability in a Rapidly Urbanizing Mid-Size City: Lessons for Planning in the Global South. Sustainability, 17 (4), 1504. https: //doi.org/10.3390/su17041504.
Kashef, M. (2023). Urban livability across disciplinary and professional boundaries. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 5 (2), 239–253. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2016.03.003.#3.
Liang, X., Yaolin, L., Tianqi, Q. (2022). Livability Assessment of Urban Communities considering the Preferences of Different Age Groups, Complexity, 1 (4)., 1-15. https: //doi.org/10.1155/2020/8269274.
Long, Y., Wu, Y., Huang, L., Aleksejeva, J., Iossifova, D., Dong, N., & Gasparatos, A. (2024). Assessing urban livability in Shanghai through an open source data-driven approach. npj Urban Sustainability, 4 (1), 7. https: //www.nature.com/articles/s42949-024-00146-z.
Mouratidis, K., De Vos, J., Yiannakou, A., & Politis, I. (2023). Sustainable transport modes, travel satisfaction, and emotions: Evidence from car-dependent compact cities. Travel behaviour and society, 33, 100613. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100613.
Newton, P. W. (2018). Liveable and sustainable? Socio-technical challenges for twenty-first-century cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 19 (1), 81-102. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.05.010.
Tan, M., Zhao, H., Li, G., & Qu, J. (2020). Assessment of potentially toxic pollutants and urban livability in a typical resource-based city, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27 (15), 18640-18649. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08182-9.
Xiao, Y., Lan, G., Ou, Y., Zhang, L., & Xia, J. (2023). Impact of urbanization on the spatial and temporal evolution of the water system pattern: A study of the Wuhan metropolitan area in China. Ecological Indicators, 153, 110408. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110408.
Yang, C., Guo, W., Zhang, C., Cui, A., Li, X., Zhao, T., ... & Wu, G. (2022). Characteristics and trends of hillside urbanization in China from 2007 to 2017. Habitat International, 120, 102502. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102502.
Zhan, D., Kwan, M. P., Zhang, W., Fan, J., Yu, J., & Dang, Y. (2018). Assessment and determinants of satisfaction with urban livability in China. Cities, 79, 92-101. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.025.
Zhu, Y., & Du, R. (2024). Evaluating the impact of urban landscape elements on the sense of security and local belonging-case study: Tongdejie, China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1340394. https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2024 (02)00232-3.